Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-993/2016-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2022:BS0000000840 AI generated

Appeal against custody order dismissed; joint custody not terminated as special circumstances absent.

Case Number BS-993/2016-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the mother's request to dismiss the appeal under Section 368a of the Civil Procedure Act, finding no special circumstances warranting summary dismissal. The father sought to terminate joint custody and transfer it entirely to himself, while the mother argued the case lacked principled significance for a second instance. The court decided to proceed with the appeal because the statutory threshold for dismissal was not met, ensuring a full review of the custody dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 368a of the Civil Procedure Act; Section 368a of the Civil Procedure Act requires special circumstances to dismiss custody appeals, which are absent here, mandating full appellate review.

Keywords

AI generated
joint custody termination Civil Procedure Act summary dismissal special circumstances second instance procedure parental authority Vestre Landsret

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 368a of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
BS-2068/2015-VLR
Temporary custody decision under Family Law Act is not barred by appeal restriction in CPL s. 389a.
BS-3978/2024-OLR
Appeal dismissed for lack of legal basis to reject the appeal under the Rules of Civil Procedure.
BS-28912/2021-OLR
Court grants supervised visitation to mother while sole custody remains with father due to high conflict.
BS-29747/2025-OLR
Appeal against family court visitation order dismissed as no permit required under parental responsibility law.
BS-1923/2016-OLR
Appeal allowed because digital filing after office hours counts as timely under new statute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Denne ankesag afvises ikke. Sagen overgår til landsrettens 11. afdeling

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Vestre Landsrets 14. afdeling holdt den 16. august 2016 kl. 15.30 møde på tingstedet i Viborg.

Som dommer fungerede landsdommer John Lundum.

V.L. B–0993–16

Far

mod Mor

Fremlagte bilag:

 ankestævning  ankesvarskrift.

Sagens øvrige dokumenter var til stede.

Retten i Aalborg har den 16. juni 2016 afsagt dom i 1. instans (rettens nr. BS 7- 1969/2015).

For landsretten har appellanten, Faderen , gentaget sin påstand om, at den fælles forældremyndighed over Barn ophæves og overføres til ham.

Indstævnte, Moderen , har påstået afvisning af ankesagen i medfør af retsplejelovens §

368 a, subsidiært stadfæstelse.

Til støtte for afvisningspåstanden har Moderen navnlig anført, at der ikke er udsigt til, at ankesagen vil få et andet udfald end i byretten. Sagen er ikke af principiel karakter, og der er ikke grundlag for at behandle sagen i to instanser.

Landsdommerne John Lundum, Ida Skouvig og Henrik Præstgaard (kst.) har behandlet sagen.

Der afsagdes

K e n d e l s e:

Sagen drejer sig om forældremyndigheden over Barn . Bestemmelsen i retsplejelovens § 368 a om adgangen til at afvise ankesager bør kun anvendes i sager om forældremyndighed og bopæl, hvis der foreligger særlige omstændigheder. Dette er ikke tilfældet i den foreliggende sag.

Landsretten tager derfor ikke Moderens påstand om afvisning af ankesagen til følge.

T h i b e s t e m m e s:

Denne ankesag afvises ikke.

Sagen overgår til landsrettens 11. afdeling, hvortil fremtidige henvendelser skal ske.

Sagen udsat.

John Lundum