Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-2622/2007-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2023:BS0000005355 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; lower court's decision on appointing a lay judge is upheld as no new grounds exist.

Case Number BS-2622/2007-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the City Court's decision to appoint a specific person as a lay judge. The appellant challenged the appointment letter and the court's ruling on the judge's eligibility, while the respondent submitted no arguments. The court ruled that since the City Court's reasoning was sound and the appellant offered no new grounds, the lower court's decision must stand.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Civilretsdagloven § 10; Civilretsdagloven § 11: The Court of Appeal will uphold a lower court's decision appointing a lay judge if the original reasoning is correct and the appellant fails to present new grounds that would alter the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
lay judge appointment civil court procedure appeal dismissal judicial eligibility no new grounds
AI generated
BS-2509/2010-VLR
Court dismisses appeal confirming conditions for joint trial under Section 250 of the Code of Civil Procedure are met.
BS-3046/2010-OLR
Court dismisses request for expert appraisal due to insufficient evidence from 13 photos and one report.
BS-1280/2013-OLR
Court upholds landlord's appeal confirming housing judge lacks recusal grounds for housing dispute.
SS-58/2017-OLR
Appeal dismissed because the defendant had no legal interest in reviewing the lawyer appointment for co-defendants.
BS-2687/2010-OLR
Court upholds dismissal of appeal regarding failure to respond to court order in small claims procedure. Novasol A/S v. Indkærede, 2010. Small claims procedure. Court order. Failure to respond. Dismissed appeal. Small claims. Court order. Failure to respond. Dismissed appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Byrettens kendelse stadfæstes i sag om hvorvidt der skal udpeges en bestemt person som boligdommer

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog med kendelse (2 sider) UDSKRIFT AF ØSTRE LANDSRETS RETSBOG ____________

Den 18. januar 2008 holdt Østre Landsret møde i retsbygningen, Bredgade 59, København.

Som dommere fungerede landsdommerne Østerborg, Jan Uffe Rasmussen og Bo Linderoth Rasmussen (kst.), førstnævnte som rettens formand.

Som protokolfører fungerede Medarbejder ved retten.

Der foretoges

9. afd. Kære. nr. B-2622-07: Kærende ApS, tidligere Sagsøger ApS (advokat Michael Holsting) mod Indkærede ApS, tidligere Sagsøgte ApS (advokat Harry Ruby Andreasen)

Ingen var mødt eller indkaldt.

Der fremlagdes kæreskrift af 10. december 2007, hvorved Kærende ApS, tidligere Sagsøger ApS har kæret Københavns Byrets kendelse af 26. november 2007 (BS 32C-2336/2007) om en lægdom-mers habilitet, dommerens fremsendelsesbrev af

13. december 2007 og udskrift af retsbo-gen indeholdende den kærede afgørelse.

Indkærede har ikke udtalt sig vedrørende kæren.

Dommeren har ved sagens fremsendelse henholdt sig til den trufne afgørelse.

De modtagne bilag var til stede.

Efter votering afsagdes sålydende

k e n d e l s e:

Af de grunde, der er anført af boligretten, og idet det for landsretten anførte ikke kan føre til andet resultat

b e s t e m m e s:

Boligrettens kendelse stadfæstes.

Retten hævet.