Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-2113/2007-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2023:BS0000005346 AI generated

Claim dismissed because plaintiff failed to prove the arbitration clause designates Copenhagen District Court.

Case Number BS-2113/2007-KBH
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The plaintiff's claim was dismissed because they failed to substantiate that the contract's dispute resolution clause specifically designates the Copenhagen District Court. The court noted the agreement stated disputes would be solved in a Danish court but lacked specificity regarding the exact venue. Consequently, the court could not refer the case to the correct jurisdiction and rejected the action under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2; A claim for jurisdiction is dismissed when the plaintiff fails to prove the contractual dispute resolution clause designates the specific court where the action is filed.

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional dispute arbitration clause venue designation contractual agreement code of civil procedure plaintiff burden court referral

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2
retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2.
AI generated
BS-2704/2008-OLR
Court dismisses appeal, remands case to correct venue based on service contract and jurisdiction rules.
BS-5643/2022-HJR
Court dismisses claim that a dissolved partnership created a silent company with shareable ownership.
BS-1517/2009-VLR
Court dismisses claim for jurisdiction in Denmark as performance place is Spain under Brussels I Regulation.
SKS-543/2010-KOL
Court allows bankruptcy petition without notice as debtor's lawyer was informed and debtor remained at registered address.
BS-940/2007-VLR
Court dismisses appeal against by-court judgment, upholding conviction for illegal possession of firearms.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om værneting

[DOKUMENT] Dom (1 sider) Københavns Byret

Udskrift af dombogen

DOM

afsagt den 7. maj 2007 i sag nr. BS 14A-2113/2007:

Glenco A/S Stamholmen 110 2650 Hvidovre mod TEAM, Tecnologia Europa Alpicada al Movimiento S.L. Buonos Aires E-08029 Barcelona Spain

Af en mellem parterne indgået kontrakt, der er fremlagt som bilag 3, fremgår blandt andet: "if any disagreements should arise between the parties, they will be solved according to Danish Law in a Danish court."

Rettens begrundelse:

Sagsøger har ikke med sagens bilag 3 godtgjort, at parterne har aftalt, at sa-gen skal anlægges ved Københavns Byret. Da retten ikke kan henvise sagen til rette domstol, afvises sagen, jf. retsplejelovens § 248, stk. 2.

Thi bestemmes:

Sagen afvises.

Dommer

STD061958-S01-ST01-K199-T3-L01-M00-P01-\D3