Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-213/2024-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2025:SS0000000065 AI generated

Court upholds lower court decision on data collection regarding non-mandatory traffic and location data.

Case Number SS-213/2024-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the lower court's decision regarding the investigation and request for publication of non-mandatory traffic and location data. The prosecution sought access to these specific data points, while the defense argued against their collection without strict necessity. The court ruled that the request was valid under the relevant legal framework governing data access in criminal investigations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Straffelovens § 163; Straffelovens § 164: The court establishes that law enforcement may request publication of non-mandatory traffic and location data when specific investigative needs are demonstrated and proportionality is maintained.

Keywords

AI generated
non-mandatory traffic data location data collection criminal investigation access data publication request proportionality principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Straffelovens § 163
Straffelovens § 164
AI generated
SS-1484/2009-ODE
Court orders telecom company to provide historical data relevant to criminal investigation upon prosecutor's request.
SS-7172/2023-ARH
Court dismisses appeal regarding non-mandatory traffic and location data access without judicial warrant.
SS-311/2009-OLR
Court allows police to access historical telecom data from public phones for suspected robbery investigation.
SS-79/2008-VLR
Court dismisses appeal as extended telecommunication disclosure requirements were not met by the lower court.
SS-1315/2011-ARH
Court rules prior judicial approval is mandatory for mobile phone triangulation even with victim consent.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stedfæster byrettens afgørelse i sag om efterforskning og anmodning om edition vedrørende ikke logningspligtige trafik- og lokaliseringsdata

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.