BS-443/2008-HER
ECLI:DK:HER:2025:BS0000000146
AI generated
Court dismisses transfer of business claim due to lack of evidence proving business transfer occurred.
Denmark (DK)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for restitution based on alleged business transfer and gift. The plaintiff argued that the defendant received a business transfer without adequate compensation, constituting a gift. The court found no evidence supporting the assertion that a business transfer actually took place.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKonkurslovens § 64, stk. 1; § 74: A claim for restitution based on alleged business transfer and gift is dismissed when the plaintiff fails to provide evidence proving the transfer occurred.
Keywords
AI generated
business transfer
restitution claim
gift evidence
bankruptcy law
transfer of assets
Cited Legislation
AI generatedKonkurslovens § 64, stk. 1
Sag om omstødelse i medfør af konkurslovens § 64, stk. 1 og § 74, idet sag omhandler spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt der er sket virksomhedsoverdragelse til sagsøgte, og om der er ydet sagsøgte en gave i forbindelse hermed
Konkurslovens § 74
Related Decisions
AI generatedBS-1352/2009-HJO
Bankruptcy court allows partial restitution of gift due to bad faith and asset mismanagement.
BS-5761/2008-KBH
Court allows clawback of payments that worsened debtor's insolvency under bankruptcy law.
BS-2976/2006-OLR
Court holds transfer of pending claim is admissible without court approval if creditor consents.
BS-1165/2010-ESB
Court allows claim against director for damages arising from company restructuring in Denmark.
BS-43618/2021-VLR
Court allows gift tax claim based on special circumstances due to high debt-to-value ratio in property transfers.
Full text
Sag om omstødelse i medfør af konkurslovens § 64, stk. 1 og § 74, idet sag omhandler spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt der er sket virksomhedsoverdragelse til sagsøgte, og om der er ydet sagsøgte en gave i forbindelse hermed