SS-627/2006-HBK
ECLI:DK:HBK:2025:SS0000000076
AI generated
Court dismissed prosecution for violating public order regulations regarding unauthorized presence in a restricted area.
Denmark (DK)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the prosecution for alleged violations of the public order regulations concerning unauthorized presence. The defendant was charged with breaching specific sections of the regulations by entering a restricted zone without permission. The court found that the defendant's actions did not constitute a violation under the applicable legal standards.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedOrdensbekendtgørelse § 3, stk. 1 og 3; The court held that unauthorized presence in a restricted area does not constitute a violation if the individual was not aware of the restriction or had a valid reason for entry.
Keywords
AI generated
public order regulations
unauthorized presence
restricted area entry
criminal prosecution dismissal
knowledge requirement
procedural outcome
statutory interpretation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedOrdensbekendtgørelse § 3, stk. 1
Ordensbekendtgørelse § 3, stk. 3
Related Decisions
AI generatedSS-257/2008-ALB
Court dismissed charges for theft and disorderly conduct due to insufficient evidence of intent and lack of specific intent elements.
SS-1153/2010-KBH
Court partially allows protest speech charge but dismisses disorder claim due to lack of evidence.
SS-1350/2008-VLR
Search, visitation, and seizure ordered by police were declared unlawful due to lack of legal basis.
SS-2844/2007-OLR
Landsret frifinder for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 119 og § 121 da anholdelse ikke var lovlig.
SS-2610/2007-ARH
Court awards damages for tort due to criminal accusation disclosure affecting employment reputation.
Full text
Tiltale for overtrædelse af ordensbekendtgørelsens § 3, stk. 1 og 3