Legislator Case Law & Legislation
BS-2824/2012-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000001328 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal confirming lower court's decision denying representation rights to a non-lawyer.

Case Number BS-2824/2012-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Vestre Landsret upheld the Aalborg District Court's decision denying Part A's right to act as a court representative. Part A challenged the ruling, arguing they should be permitted to represent the defendant in the proceedings. The court found no merit in the appeal and confirmed the lower court's finding that the individual lacked the necessary qualification to represent the party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure: A person without a legal qualification is not entitled to represent a party in civil proceedings as a court representative.

Keywords

AI generated
court representation legal qualification civil procedure rules non-lawyer representative appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Byrettens afgørelse stadfæstes, i sag om hvorvidt en person kan anses for berettiget til at repræsentere sagsøgte

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Vestre Landsret holdt den 21. november 2012 kl. 14.00 møde på tingstedet i Viborg.

Som dommere fungerede landsdommerne Hanne Kildal, Stig Glent-Madsen og Berit Viegaard Andersson (kst.).

V.L. B–2824–12

Part A

mod Aalborg Kommune

Fremlagte bilag:

 kæreskrift  breve af 9. og 15. november 2012 fra Retten i Aalborg  udskrift af domog retsbogen (sag nr. BS 2-2638/2011).

Ved afgørelse af 23. oktober 2012 har Retten i Aalborg bestemt, at Person 1 ikke anses for berettiget til som rettergangsfuldmægtig at repræsentere Part A under sagen.

Afgørelsen er kæret af Part A .

Landsretten afsagde

K e n d e l s e:

Landsretten er enig i byrettens resultat og begrundelsen herfor. Landsretten stadfæster derfor byrettens afgørelse.

T h i b e s t e m m e s:

Byrettens afgørelse stadfæstes.

Kæremålets omkostninger ophæves. Sagen sluttet.

Hanne Kildal