Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-2638/2011-ALB ECLI:DK:ALB:2024:BS0000001327 AI generated

Court denies immediate injunction, scheduling hearing to decide if employee can represent client.

Case Number BS-2638/2011-ALB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court refused the plaintiff's request for an immediate order prohibiting the defendant from exercising their professional activities. The plaintiff submitted letters arguing that the defendant should be barred from representing the client during the proceedings. Consequently, the court decided to postpone the decision until the scheduled main hearing on November 6, 2012.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 24 af Retten i Aalborgs forretningsordning; The court may postpone a request for an interim measure to the main hearing when the circumstances warrant a full examination of the merits at that time.

Keywords

AI generated
interim measure professional activities representation rights main hearing procedural postponement legal representation court scheduling
AI generated
BS-850/2011-HIL
Court dismisses service of process on a lawyer not appointed by the defendant under Civil Procedure Act s. 161.
BS-2824/2012-VLR
Court dismisses appeal confirming lower court's decision denying representation rights to a non-lawyer.
BS-32481/2022-HJR
Court dismisses claim that a settlement barred a teacher from pursuing age discrimination under the Equal Treatment Act.
BS-2047/2008-OLR
High Court reverses District Court dismissal due to lack of sufficient grounds for procedural rejection.
BS-188/2019-VLR
Court dismisses debt collection case where defendant claims unauthorized use of her digital ID by an ex-partner.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om hvorvidt en person kan anses for berettiget til at repræsentere sagsøgte

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Person 1 må anses for ansat også med det særlige formål for øje at møde i retten for Part A .

Retten bemærkede, at rettens beslutning kan kæres. Kærefristen er 2 uger. Kære sker ved indlevering af kæreskrift vedlagt kæreafgift på 400 kr. til retten med kopi til modparten.

Retten bemærkede, at hovedforhandling er berammet til foretagelse tirsdag den 6. november 2012 kl. 12.30.

Ved de fremlagte breve har sagsøgeren anmodet om, at retten nu afsiger kendelse om, at sagsøgte under sagens behandling ikke må udøve den virksomhed, som tilladelsen vedrører.

Retten besluttede efter omstændighederne, at der tages stilling til begæringen i forbindelse med den berammede hovedforhandling den 6. november 2012. Hvis hovedforhandlingen udsættes eller omberammes, kan der forventes taget stilling til begæringen i den forbindelse.

Parterne samt Person 1 underrettes ved udskrift af retsbogen.

Sagen udsat.

Retten hævet.

Dommer