Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
FS-1177/2012-ROS ECLI:DK:ROS:2024:FS0000000038 AI generated

Payment claim dismissed due to prior interest ruling; creditor's cited case involves different credit relationship.

Case Number FS-1177/2012-ROS
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the payment claim because interest had already been ruled upon in a prior decision by the Copenhagen City Court. The creditor argued that the cited precedent regarding a running credit relationship was applicable, but the court distinguished this case based on the specific circumstances. Consequently, the claim was rejected as the legal basis for interest was already settled in the earlier ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 136 of the Act on Payment Claims; A prior ruling on interest in the main claim precludes a new claim for interest in the same matter, distinguishing cases involving running credit relationships.

Keywords

AI generated
payment claim dismissal interest ruling precedent creditor argument rejection Copenhagen City Court running credit relationship

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 136 of the Act on Payment Claims

Cited Case Law

AI generated
U 2008.54 ØL
U 2008.54 ØL, som K A/S henviser til, drejer sig om et løbende kreditforhold og kan derfor ikke umiddelbart sammenlignes med denne sag.
AI generated
FS-11882/2018-ARH
Claim dismissed for accrued interest on expired debt portion due to statute of limitations violation.
BS-1257/2021-BOR
Civil Service Court awards damages to state for compensation paid to criminal defendant.
BS-10477/2019-HIL
Court holds borrower liable for loan taken by acquaintance due to negligence in securing identity.
BS-1066/2008-ROS
Default judgment upheld after defendant failed to respond; court dismissed request to reopen proceedings under Civil Procedure Act.
BS-2194/2008-RAN
Court orders payment for car repairs after defendant failed to prove service defects caused acceleration issues.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om betalingspåkrav

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) -1- 1

Retten i Roskilde

Den 14. marts 2012 kl. 11:56 blev fogedretten sat Fællessekretariatet af Dommer .

Der blev foretaget FS 13-1177/2012 Kreditor A/S (K A/S)

Adresse 1 5000 Odense C mod Debitor Adresse 2 By 1

Der blev fremlagt: Betalingspåkrav

Det skyldige beløb blev opgjort således: Krav 69.340,81 kr. Betalingspåkrav -grundafgift 970,00 kr. Ialt: 70.310,81 kr.

Sagen afvises, da der er renter i hovedstolen jf. Københavns Byrets kendelse af 20. december 2011. U 2008.54 ØL, som K A/S henviser til, drejer sig om et løbende kreditforhold og kan derfor ikke umiddelbart sammenlignes med denne sag.

Sagen sluttet.

Fogedretten hævet.

Dommer