Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
FS-10185/2010-LYN ECLI:DK:LYN:2024:FS0000000027 AI generated

Court dismisses auction request due to parties' illegal protective agreement violating legal provisions.

Case Number FS-10185/2010-LYN
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the auction request because the parties entered into an illegal protective agreement. The creditor and debtor had concluded a protective agreement that the court found unlawful under the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the court refused to proceed with the auction as the underlying agreement lacked legal validity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 487 of the Code of Civil Procedure; § 245 of the Code of Civil Procedure: A protective agreement concluded between parties in court proceedings is invalid if it violates statutory requirements, thereby precluding the enforcement of the debt through auction.

Keywords

AI generated
illegal protective agreement Code of Civil Procedure auction request dismissal court proceedings validity creditor debtor dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 487 of the Code of Civil Procedure
§ 245 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
BS-3315/2010-ARH
Court dismisses referral request, holding auction court lacks jurisdiction over civil proceedings regarding property disputes.
BS-2548/2008-OLR
Appeal dismissed because failure to pay the undisputed portion of the security sum prevents auction despite water fee error.
BS-742/2013-OLR
Court dismisses joint auction request for two creditors due to separate creditor status and procedural rules.
BS-21/2015-VLR
Court allows attorney appointment in forced auction when debtor seeks private sale to avoid auction.
AS-181/2018-FRB
Court allows foreclosure auction of building with leasehold rights per association bylaws without maximum price.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sagen drejer sig om byrettens afvisning af en auktionsbegæring, idet parterne havde indgået en ulovlig værnetingsaftale

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse Retten i Lyngby

Den 17. december 2010 kl. 14:50 blev fogedretten sat i fogedretten af Dommer .

Der blev foretaget ES 25040185/2010

Kreditor ApS mod Debitor Adresse 1 F-06000 Nice Frankrig

Ingen indkaldt eller mødt.

Begæring fra advokat Simon Hertzurn.

Det skyldige belØb blev opgjort således: Sagen opgjort til 361.941,51 kr. Ialt 361.941,51 kr.

Fogedretten besluttede, at afvise auktionshegæringen, idet der ikke er foreta aet udleo Lt.

Fogedretten besluttede. ar afvise udlægshegæring. idet der ikke ses at være værneting ved Retten i Lyngby. Den mellem parterne i retten indgàede vær netingaftale vedrorende fogedsager er ikke lovlig jf. retsplejelovens * 487 jf. § 245.

Sagen sluttet. Fogedretten hævet.

Dommer