Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
FS-5372/2017-SVE ECLI:DK:SVE:2024:FS0000000035 AI generated

Court dismisses debt claim because debtor's domicile existed at filing, not when address data became available.

Case Number FS-5372/2017-SVE
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Fogedretten in Svendborg dismissed a debt claim of 53,119.45 DKK against a debtor who had moved abroad. The plaintiff argued that the debtor's foreign address became available in the population register only after the lawsuit was filed, yet the court determined the critical date was the filing date itself. Consequently, the court ruled that the existence of a domicile at the time of filing was the sole legal standard, rendering the timing of data access irrelevant to the claim's validity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 16, stk. 1 af Gældsbrevsloven; The court holds that the existence of a debtor's domicile at the time of filing a debt claim is the decisive factor, not the date when information regarding their absence becomes available in public registers.

Keywords

AI generated
domicile at filing debt claim dismissal population register data timing of address civil procedure standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 16, stk. 1 af Gældsbrevsloven
AI generated
BS-2589/2017-OLR
Court dismisses debt claim dismissal because debtor's domicile status remains unproven after departure.
BS-1403/2007-SON
Court dismisses edition request against bankruptcy estate citing financial secrecy law and lack of statutory basis.
FS-10090/2010-HJO
Court dismisses claim for excessive collection fees due to statutory cap on recurring charges.
BS-38449/2023-HOL
Court dismisses pilots' tax relief claim due to insufficient proof of non-residence and lack of prior administrative practice.
BS-55735/2023-OLR
Court upholds patient compensation claim for loss of support despite appellant's independent income.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om hvorvidt det er afgørende, at oplysninger om at skyldner havde bopæl i landet ved sagens indgivelse

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Retten i Svendborg

Den 22. november 2017 kl. 10:03 blev fogedretten sat i Retsbygningen af Dommer .

Der blev foretaget FS 6-5372/2017

Léasy (3C RETAIL A/S) Østre Stationsvej 1 5000 Odense C mod Debitor 1 udrejst 1/8-2017 5700 Svendborg

Der blev fremlagt: Betalingspåkrav

Det skyldige beløb blev opgjort således: Krav 52.719,45 kr. Betalingspåkrav -grundafgift 400,00 kr. Civil sag 100,00 kr. Civil sag indledes ikke -100,00 kr. Ialt: 53.119,45 kr.

Sagen blev afvist den 6 oktober 2017. Denne afgørelse er ikke kæret.

Sagen er nu søgt genbehandlet med henvisning til, at oplysningen om skyldners udrejse pr. 1. august 2017 til uoplyst adresse i udlandet først blev tilgængelig i folkeregisteret den 3. oktober 2017 og dermed efter, at sagen blev indgivet den 24. august 2017.

Der afsagdes sålydende

Kendelse:

Det afgørende er, om skyldner havde faktisk bopæl i landet ved sagens indgivelse. Det er derimod ikke afgørende, hvornår oplysningerne bliver tilgængelige.

Derfor bestemmes:

Sagen afvises

Sagen sluttet. Fogedretten hævet.

Dommer