Court dismissed claim to revoke safety decree as no new facts or legal grounds were presented.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the Justice Minister's refusal to revoke a safety decree. The plaintiff argued that the decree was invalid due to procedural errors and lack of evidence, but the court found no new facts or legal arguments sufficient to overturn the original decision. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the lower court's decision was legally flawed.