Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AS-456/2012-HBK ECLI:DK:HBK:2024:AS0000000010 AI generated

Court dismisses enforcement of registered pre-emptive right against forced auction due to lack of proper notice and procedural defects.

Case Number AS-456/2012-HBK
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the applicant's request to enforce a registered pre-emptive right against a forced auction of the property. The applicant argued that the right was validly registered and should have been notified, while the opposing party contended that procedural requirements for such notifications were not met. The court ruled that without proof of proper notice and adherence to statutory procedures, the pre-emptive right could not be enforced in this specific auction scenario.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sections 10 and 11 of the Act on Forced Auctions; A registered pre-emptive right is not enforceable against a forced auction if the statutory requirements for notice and procedural compliance are not satisfied.

Keywords

AI generated
pre-emptive right forced auction procedural notice registration validity enforcement dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act on Forced Auctions, Section 10
Act on Forced Auctions, Section 11
AI generated
BS-1091/2013-OLR
Court upholds auction buyer's duty to respect pre-emptive right servitude despite sale price claims.
AS-291/2015-HBK
Court orders auction buyer to pay overdue property tax as part of the maximum bid amount.
BS-742/2013-OLR
Court dismisses joint auction request for two creditors due to separate creditor status and procedural rules.
BS-871/2020-OLR
Court allows foreclosure auction of building and leasehold rights subject to association rules.
BS-3315/2010-ARH
Court dismisses referral request, holding auction court lacks jurisdiction over civil proceedings regarding property disputes.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om, hvorvidt og i givet fald under hvilke omstændigheder en tinglyst forkøbsret kan gøres gældende i forbindelse med en tvangsauktion

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (11 sider) Dommer

Matr. nr. 1 Adresse 1 By 1 Ejer 1

Liebhaver 1

Matr. nr. 2 Adresse 1 By 1 Liebhaver 1 Adresse 1 By 1

Liebhaver 1 Adresse 2 Adresse 3 By 1 Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Gård Adresse 4 Liebhaver 1

Ejer 1 Adresse 5 Liebhaver 1

Adresse 1 By 1 Matr. nr. 1 Ejer 1

Matr. nr. 1 Gård Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Gård Matr. nr. 1

Matr. nr. 2 Ejer 1

Matr. nr. 2 m.fl. Ejer 1 Adresse 1

Ejer 1 Ejer 1

Ejer 1

Ejer 1

Liebhaver 1

Adresse 1 By 1

Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Matr. nr. 1 Adresse 1 By 1 Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Gård Matr. nr. 1 Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Liebhaver 1

Gård Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Ejer 1

Ejer 1

Liebhaver 1 Matr. nr. 2 m. fl. Adresse 3 Matr. nr. 1 Adresse 1

Matr. nr. 1 Matr. nr. 1 Gård Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Matr. nr. 2 m. fl.

Adresse 1 By 1

Liebhaver 1

Dommer