Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-1359/2011-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000001124 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal for non-refund of court fees based on analogy to rejected case rules.

Case Number BS-1359/2011-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Vestre Landsret upheld the Byret's decision to deny the refund of 26,700 DKK in court fees to the appellant. The appellant argued that fees should be returned by analogy to rules governing refunds for rejected cases under Section 62 of the Court Fees Act. The court rejected this argument, agreeing with the lower court that the specific conditions for fee refunds were not met in this instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 62 of the Court Fees Act; The court fees for a case where the claim is dismissed are not subject to refund by analogy to provisions regarding rejected cases unless specific statutory conditions are met.

Keywords

AI generated
court fees refund analogy application rejected case rules Vestre Landsret court fees act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 62, paragraph 3 of the Court Fees Act
retsafgiftslovens § 62, stk.
AI generated
BS-624/2016-OLR
Court dismissed appeal against fee retention where creditor's revocation occurred after second notice was issued.
BS-44469/2021-VLR
Court dismissed claim for compensation regarding delayed main hearing under Section 320 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
BS-599/2024-VLR
Court dismisses appeal on costs, upholding lower court's decision based on procedural rules.
BS-2638/2008-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against dismissal due to procedural time limit violation by defendant's counsel.
BS-1658/2008-VLR
Court dismisses tenant's claim for renovation costs after landlord's death and estate liquidation concludes.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæster byrettens afgørelse, og tiltræder hermed, at retsafgift ikke skal tilbagebetales til kærende

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Vestre Landsret holdt den 24juni 2011 kl. 9.00 møde på tingstedet i Viborg.

Som dommer fungerede landsdommer John Lundum.

Som retssekretær fungerede Medarbejder .

Vi. 8—1359—11

Part 1 (Enkeltmandsvirksomhed)

kærer byrettens afgørelse om at nægte at tilbagebetale retsafgift

Fremlagte bilag:

— kæreskrift — brev af 24. maj 2011 fra Retten i Esbjerg — udskrift afretsbogen (sag nr. BS 98-2042/20 10).

Ved kendelse af 4. maj 2011 har Retten i Esbjerg truffet afgørelse om, at en retsafgift på 26.700 kr.. ikke skal tilbagebetales til kærende.

Kendelsen er kæret af Part 1 med påstand om, at retsafgiften samt kæreafgiflen for nærværende kæremål skal tilbagebetales. Til støt te for påstanden har kærende navnlig anført, at afgiften skal tilbagebetales efter en analogi af reglerne om tilbagebetaling af afgiften for en afvist sag,jf. retsafgiftslovens § 62, stk. 3.

Landsdommeme John Lundum, Stig Glent-Madsen og Grith Rosleff(kst.) har behandLet sagen.

Landsretten afsagde

K e n d e I s e:

Landsretten er enig i byrettens resultat og begrundelsen herfor. Landsretten stadfæster der for byrettens kendelse.

Thi bestemmes:

Byrettens kendelse stadfæstes.

Kæremålets omkostninger ophæves.

Sagen sluttet.

John Lundum / Medarbejder

'

Anonymiseret