Legislator Case Law & Legislation
BS-1658/2008-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000001079 AI generated

Court dismisses tenant's claim for renovation costs after landlord's death and estate liquidation concludes.

Case Number BS-1658/2008-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the tenant's claim for renovation costs because the landlord's estate was liquidated and no active legal proceedings existed. The tenant's lawyer argued for payment of expenses, but the opposing party contended the estate was closed and no claims remained. The court ruled that since the estate was finalized, there was no standing to sue, leading to dismissal under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 258, stk. 2; When a deceased person's estate is liquidated and no active legal proceedings exist, the court must dismiss the case from the courts as there is no standing to sue.

Keywords

AI generated
estate liquidation standing to sue deceased tenant renovation costs dismissal from courts Code of Civil Procedure no active proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure § 258, paragraph 2
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten ophævede byrettens dom i sag om betaling af istandsættelsesudgifter og afviste sagen fra domstolene, jf. retsplejelovens § 258, stk. 2

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) DON

afsagt den 22. april 2009 af Vestre Landsrets 1. afdeling (landsdommerne Lars E. Andersen, Annette Dellgren og Mogens

Heinsen) i ankesag V.L. B-l658-08

Udlejer A/B

(advokat C. Meyer Petersen, Århus) mod

Boet efter Lejer

(advokat Henrik Adam Staunskjær, Skanderborg)

Boligretten i Århus har den 27. juni 2008 afsagt dom i 1. in stans (BS 9-2287/2007)

Appellanten, Udlejer A/B , har i ankestæv ningen gentaget sine påstande for byretten.

Ankesagen var berammet til hovedforhandling den 3. april 2009.

Advokat Henrik Adam Staunskjær har i brev af 2. april 2009 meddelt, at dødsboet efter Lejer i sensommeren

2008 er afsluttet ved boudlæg. Landsretten har forstået dette brev således, at boet ikke er genoptaget, og at boudlægget ik ke omfatter det mulige krav mod Udlejer A/B

.

—2—

Landsrettens begrundelse og resultat:

Da dødsboet efter Lejer er afsluttet ved boud læg, eksisterer der ikke nogen indstævnt. Landsretten ophæver derfor byrettens dom og afviser sagen fra domstolene, jf. retsplejelovens § 258, stk. 2.

Thi kendes for ret:

Denne sag afvises fra domstolene.

Lars E. Andersen Annette Dellgren Mogens Heinsen