Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-772/2024-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2024:SS0000000816 AI generated

Court upholds name ban extension ruling based on public interest and lack of proportionality concerns.

Case Number SS-772/2024-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the lower court's decision to extend the name ban against the defendant. The defendant argued the extension violated their rights, but the court found no disproportionate interference with public interest. Consequently, the extension was deemed legally sound and necessary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Straffeloven § 113; Straffeloven § 114: A name ban extension is permissible if it serves a legitimate public interest and does not disproportionately infringe upon the individual's rights.

Keywords

AI generated
name ban extension public interest proportionality principle freedom of name criminal law sanction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Straffeloven § 113
Straffeloven § 114
AI generated
SS-223/2011-OLR
High Court lifts name ban in lawyer embezzlement case due to public interest in open trial.
BS-230/2022-OLR
Court upholds anonymization of minor defendants' names in public court records despite press request for full names.
BS-28914/2024-OLR
Second instance court dismisses appeal to exclude ban case from court docket, upholding first instance decision.
SS-662/2006-VIB
Court dismisses appeal regarding extension of previous name ban to current criminal proceedings.
SS-1647/2011-OLR
Court overturns door closure order in public trial due to lack of justification for preventing information disclosure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæster byrettens kendelse om udstrækning af navneforbud

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Orientering fra Domsdatabasen: Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag. Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende afgørelser. De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i Domsdatabasen.