Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-27012/2023-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2024:BS0000000965 AI generated

Denmark Supreme Court dismissed human rights claims regarding refusal of case reopening. The court found no violation of ECHR Article 8 or Convention Articles 3, 20.

Case Number BS-27012/2023-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court declined to reopen the proceedings, determining that the refusal to do so did not constitute a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights or the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The applicant argued that the lower court's decision infringed upon their rights, but the higher court found no such breach based on the specific circumstances. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, upholding the original procedural outcome.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ECHR Art. 8; UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Art. 3, 20: A refusal to reopen proceedings does not constitute a violation of human rights or children's rights if the original decision was lawful and proportionate.

Keywords

AI generated
case reopening refusal European Convention Article 8 UN Convention Rights of Child procedural fairness violation human rights claim dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
ECHR Article 8
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 3
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 20
Art. 8 eller
Art. 3 og
AI generated
BS-7042/2024-VLR
Appeal dismissed because leave from the Procedure Permission Board was required under the Rules of Civil Procedure but not obtained.
BS-61216/2023-OLR
Court reverses family court ruling on child abduction, allowing child to remain with mother against father's return claim.
SS-3473/2022-OLR
Appeal dismissed because medical evidence failed to prove lawful expiration of the detention order.
BS-9/2014-HJR
Court dismisses appeal on costs as original appeal covered entire lower court decision including costs.
BS-1718/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; parole denied due to inability to assess treatment needs and high recidivism risk.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten genoptog ikke sagen, idet man ikke anså afslag på genoptagelse for at udgøre en krænkelse af hverken Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonventions artikel 8 eller Børnekonventionens artikel 3 og artikel 20

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.