Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-1141/2008-NAE AI generated

Court dismissed case due to plaintiff's failure to submit a required reply within the deadline.

Case Number BS-1141/2008-NAE
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the case because the plaintiff's counsel failed to submit a reply to specific questions raised by the court. Although the lawyer argued that a previous letter and fax should suffice, the court noted that a formal reply was explicitly requested. Consequently, the lack of a timely response resulted in the case being rejected under the relevant procedural statutes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 406, stk. 3; § 360: Failure to submit a required reply to the court's questions within the prescribed deadline results in the dismissal of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
failure to reply procedural dismissal court questions deadline compliance civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 406, stk. 3
retsplejelovens § 406, stk. 3, jf.
Retsplejelovens § 360
AI generated
BS-1092/2010-OLR
Appeal against dismissal for missing phone meeting without legal cause; court finds no valid reason for dismissal.
BS-331/2009-SON
Court dismisses father's appeal as Child Custody Act conditions for reopening the case were not met.
BS-8882/2004-KBH
Court dismisses defendant's motion to dismiss case due to significant procedural delay but allows proceedings to continue.
FS-8835/2007-NYK
Claim dismissed because it includes late fees and interest, violating the requirement for registration under the Registration Act.
BS-7042/2024-VLR
Appeal dismissed because leave from the Procedure Permission Board was required under the Rules of Civil Procedure but not obtained.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Afgørelse om afvisning, jf. retsplejelovens § 406, stk. 3, jf. § 360

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog (2 sider) RETTEN I NÆSTVED

Udskrift af retsbogen

Den 17. oktober 2008 kl. 16:00 blev retten sat på dommerkontoret af Dommer.

Der blev foretaget i offentligt retsmøde sag nr. BS 50-1141/2008:

Sagsøger ApS Adresse 1 By mod Sagsøgte Adresse 2 By

Ingen indkaldt eller mødt.

Der fremlagdes:

- stævning med bilag 1 - 3

- svarskrift

- rettens brev til parterne af 10. september 2008 og 7. oktober 2008

- sagsøgers telefax af 16. oktober 2008 med telefax af 9. september 2008.

Retten bemærkede, at sagsøgers advokat ikke har afgivet replik eller for-holdt sig til rettens spørgsmål i brevet af 10. september 2008.

Retten bemærkede endvidere, at retten i brevet af 7. oktober 2008 til sagsøgers advokat anførte, at manglende overholdelse af replikfristen kan tillægges udeblivelsesvirkning.

Da sagsøger således ikke har afgivet replik eller i øvrigt meddelt sine bemærkninger til de i rettens brev af 10. september 2008 rejste spørgsmål, besluttede retten at afvise sagen, jf. retsplejelovens § 406, stk. 3, jf. § 360.

Det forhold, at sagsøgers advokat i brev af 9. september 2008 og telefax af16. oktober 2008 frafalder replik kan ikke føre til et andet resultat, idet ret-ten udtrykkeligt har anmodet om en besvarelse af de i brevet af 10. septem-ber 2008 rejste spørgsmål.

Der sendes udskrift af retsbogen til parternes advokater.

STD074637-S01-ST18-K188.02-T2-L03-M14-P01-\R39 Sagen sluttet.

Retten hævet.

Dommer

STD074637-S01-ST18-K188.02-T2-L03-M14-P01-\R39