Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
FS-10843/2011-SON ECLI:DK:SON:2022:FS0000000006 AI generated

Payment claim dismissed due to inconsistency between cost item 4 and total in item 5 under CPL § 477c.

Case Number FS-10843/2011-SON
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the payment claim because the cost item labeled '4' contained no specific amounts, creating a discrepancy with the total sum in item '5'. The plaintiff failed to list any fees for collection costs, interest, or attorney fees in the designated section. Consequently, the court ruled the claim invalid under the Civil Procedure Act and ordered it to be withdrawn.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

CPL § 477c stk. 1; A payment claim is invalid and must be dismissed if there is an inconsistency between the specific cost items listed and the total amount claimed.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act payment claim dismissal inconsistent cost items collection fees attorney fees total amount discrepancy formal defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPL § 477c stk. 1
AI generated
FS-6840/2023-HBK
Court dismissed payment claim due to failure to serve prior demand letter as required by law.
FS-12230/2016-NAE
Payment claim dismissed because creditor failed to submit required repair notice within the statutory deadline.
BS-355/2008-VLR
Land's court sets aside district court dismissal due to unclear legal basis in payment claim under Civil Procedure Act.
FS-10090/2010-HJO
Court dismisses claim for excessive collection fees due to statutory cap on recurring charges.
FS-8835/2007-NYK
Claim dismissed because it includes late fees and interest, violating the requirement for registration under the Registration Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om afvisning af betalingspåkrav på grund af uoverensstemmelse mellem rubrik 4 og rubrik 5 i betalingspåkravet, jf. retsplejelovens § 477 c stk. 1

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Udskrift affogedbogen

Retten i Sønderborg

Den 23. december 2011 kl. 08:35 blev fogedretten sat på hovedtingstedet af

Der blev foretaget FS N04-10843/201 1

DEcentra Nywej 15 4621 Gadstrup mod COMTALK A/S v/ Person 1 Adresse 6100 Haderslev

Der blev fremlagt: Betalingspåkrav Fogedrettens skrivelse af den 9. december 2011 Skrivelse af 15. december 2011 fra Advokat Arne Skjoldorf

Det skyldige beløb blev opgjort således: Krav 1.204,51 kr. Betalingspåkrav -grundafgift 400,00 b. Ialt: 1.604,51 kr.

Kendelse

Advokat Arne Skjoldorf har under opgørelsen afkravets størrelse i betalingspåkravets rubrik 4 ikke anført noget beløb under omkostningspåstanden, herunder rykkerog inkassogebyrer.

Der er derfor ikke overensstemmelse mellem rubrik 4 og sagsfremstillingen i rubrik 5. Betalingspâkravet er således uklan. jE retsplejelovens § 477 c stk. 1. På den baggrund afvises betalingspåkravet i medfør af retsplejelovens § 477 c. stk. 1, derfor bestemmes:

Betalingspåkravet afrisesjf. retsplejelovens § 477 c stk. 1.

Sagen udsat. Fogedretten hævet.

Dommer