Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-25307/1999-SKA ECLI:DK:SKA:2024:SS0000000509 AI generated

Court dismisses driver's license reinstatement due to lack of special circumstances after 14 years since last offense.

Case Number SS-25307/1999-SKA
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the applicant's request to reinstate their driver's license after a 14-year period since their last conviction. Although the applicant argued for special circumstances based on their changed lifestyle and lack of recent alcohol offenses, the court noted the previous license revocation was only six years ago. Consequently, the court found no special circumstances justifying the exception to the general rule against reinstatement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Farselslovens 132 stk 1; Farselslovens 132 stk 2: Reinstatement of driving privileges after a long period is only permitted upon proof of special circumstances and urgent personal needs, which must be weighed against the recency of the last revocation.

Keywords

AI generated
driver license reinstatement special circumstances requirement alcohol offense history license revocation period exception to general rule

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Farselslovens 132 stk 1
Farselslovens 132 stk 2
AI generated
SS-460/2013-HIL
Court imposes fine and three-year driving ban for driving under influence of hash in Denmark.
SS-5824/2009-ARH
Court convicted defendant of driving under influence and imposed suspended sentence with license revocation.
SS-4375/2012-FRB
Court acquits driver of hash driving charge due to insufficient evidence proving active consumption.
SS-7006/2012-GLO
Court convicts for driving without license but acquits on hash possession, confiscating car due to prior offenses.
SS-20/2024-HJR
Supreme Court upheld license revocation for careless driving, allowing police to revoke without temporary license.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Anmodning om generhvervelse af førerretten til motordrevet køretøj, hvortil der kræves kørekort

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) Den 16. Eeplember I-999 kI 14.00 blev der ved ret.t.en i Skanderborg, 1. afdeling, i

s.s.23307/99

Begarl,ag fra

Ansogeren CPR nr Adresse 8650 gkeDderborg

o gelcrhvcrrrel ge af forerrett@.

afsagt aAlydende

TENDELgEs Ved ekrivelse af 25. juni 1999 har Ansogeren CPR nr Adresse , 8560 Skanderborg, fremsat begaring ove rfor PoliEimesE,ern i odder om generhver_ velse af farerretten t.i1 motordrevet koretoj, hvort,il der kraves korekort _

I medfor af fardselslowens S 132, jfr. Etraffeloven8 S 78, stk. 3, har politime Etern indbragt anmodningen for retten og har protesEeret mod, aE, begaringen t.agea tiI folge.

Ansogeren er senesE sEraffeE sAledee:

- dmr af 15. Eept€@ber 1993 ved retten i Skanderborg med hafte i 30 dage aamt forerreEsfrakendelse i 10 ar fra 16.

juni 1983 for blandt. andet overtradelse af fardeelslowene S 53, sEk. 1, jfr. S 112, stk. 1,

- dor af 25. februar 19BS ved relten i Skanderborg med fangsel i 40 dage og frakendt falerrett,en for bestandig for overt,radelse af fardselslovens S 53, 6tk. L, jfr.

S 112, stk.5.

Ansogeren har afgivet forklaring, hvorom henvigeg t.i1 rets_

bogen af 9. septenber 1999,

Anklageren har begrundet. sin protest med, aE der i fardsels_ Lovens S 132, stk. 1. anfares .undtagelaesvist.

og ganske sarlige omstandigheder'r samt at personlige behov ikke kan anseg for specielt presserende, hvorfor begari-ngen ikke bor imodekommes,

RetEen skal udt.ale:

Det, er forlobeE 14 ar. siden ansageren sidst er domt for spirituskarsel, og hans tiLvarelse er andreE. radikalt, hvil_ keE, taler for at imodekonrne begaringen. Der er imidlert.id kun lige forlabet 6 ar siden forrige frakendel sesperiodes udIab, og t.iltaltes behow for korekort.et findes eft.er det oplyste ikke specielE presserende. Heref t,er findes der ikke at fore_ ligge eidanne ganske sarlige omstandigheder, hvorefter forerret.t,en undtagelsesvist kan gengives ,

Thi bestemmea Ansaoe re n s begaring om generhvervelse af farer_ rett.en t.ages ikke E i1 fa19e .

I!M|a- Sagen sluttet..

Reteen havet .

ommer