Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-379/2000-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2024:SS0000000506 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed; case remitted to lower court due to statute of limitations expiration. Defendant acquitted on prior grounds.

Case Number SS-379/2000-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Eastern High Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal and remitted the case to the City Court for new proceedings. The defendant had previously been acquitted based on the statute of limitations, and the defense argued this bar should apply to the new trial. The court ruled that since the prosecution failed to provide an unconditional plea, the statute of limitations had expired, necessitating a remittal to the lower court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retssplejelovens § 925; § 963: When a defendant is acquitted due to the expiration of the limitation period, a subsequent prosecution without an unconditional plea is barred, requiring remittal to the lower court for new proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations criminal appeal acquittal grounds prosecution appeal remittal to lower court unconditional plea criminal procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retssplejelovens § 925
Retssplejelovens § 963
AI generated
SS-2300/2012-OLR
Appeal court quashes lower court dismissal and remands case for retrial with jury participation.
SS-3023/2010-OLR
ECLI:DK:OLR:2024:SS0000000999
SS-3912/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; court upholds lower court's decision to require jury participation for potential combined sentence.
SS-209/2008-VLR
Court upheld retrial of jury trial due to prior jury list exclusion affecting impartiality.
SS-2291/2014-VLR
Defense counsel's inadequate performance led to remand for retrial with new counsel and judges.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten hjemviste sagen til byretten, idet sagen burde være ført som en domsmandssag

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (2 sider) s0379002 -vL It fA

T,IDSKRIFT o & f, xt DO

AF OSTRE LANDSRETS DOMBOG

DOII{

Afsagt den 15. marts 2000 af Ostre Landsrets 8. afdeling ( landsdommerne Ulsig, osEerborg og Karen-Anke Torring).

8. afd. a.s. nr. s-0379-00: Anklagemyndigheden mod Tiltalte CPR nr (Advokat. Karen Bang e.o. ) .

Nyk@bing FaLsE.er reEs dom at L2. januar 2000 (SS 25'704/991 er ankeE af ned pesEand om formildelse.

Ank}agemyndigheden har principalE pistiet dommen ophaveE og -llElltilItsiI byreEEen i medfsr af reE.splej elovens S 963. sagen hjemvisE sEk. 3, jf. S 945, da der ikke burde vare afsagt dom i medfar af retsplejelovens S 925, nar E.ilEa1E,e pisEod sig frifundet pi grund af foraldelse, SubsidierE. har anklagemyndigheden p5sclet skerpelse.

I en fra den beskikkede forsvarer indhenteE udt,al.else har denne, uanset at forEldelsesindsigelsen opretholdes, ProtestereE mod sagens hjemvisning tsj-I fornyet. behandling ved byreEEen.

Da ti1E,a1t,e for byret.Een pAberAbte sig, ats sErafansvareE var foraldet., findes EiltalEe ikke ats have afgiveE en uforbeholden cilsEaelse, jf. ret,splej elovens S 925. sagen burde derfor ikke vare fremmeE. uden medvirken af domsmand, LandsreEtsen ophaver

derfor dommen, og sagen hj emviEeg 811 fornyet behandling ved byretten.

Thi kendes f or reE

Nykobing FatsEer regs dom i sagen mod T ta te ophaves, o!, sagen hJemvises til ny foreEagelse ved byretEen'

Sagens omkosEnlnger for byretten og landsret'Een betsaleE af sEatskassen.

(Sign.)

Udskriftens rigtighed bekraftes. Chtre Landsrcts kontor, den PJ.v.