Dismissal of discrimination claim regarding flexible job termination where procedural jurisdiction was incorrectly invoked.
Denmark (DK)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for discrimination and compensation following termination from a flexible job. The plaintiff argued the dismissal constituted unlawful differential treatment and sought to have the case transferred to the Commercial Court due to its perceived principle nature. The court rejected this request, ruling that the matter fell within the jurisdiction of the current instance and did not warrant transfer.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAfgangsloven; Forskelsbehandlingsloven: A claim for discrimination based on flexible job termination is subject to the ordinary jurisdiction of the court of first instance and does not require transfer to the Commercial Court merely because the case involves principles of law.
Keywords
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Sag om afskedigelse af sagsøger i fleksjob, og hvorvidt afskedigelsen er omfattet af forskelsbehandlingsloven. og sagsøger dermed er berettiget til godtgørelse. Sagsøger har begæret sagen henvist til Sø- og Handelsretten grundet dens, efter sagsøgers mening, principielle karakter