Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-2727/2007-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2023:BS0000004745 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal against disciplinary board inquiry questions in accounting firm case.

Case Number BS-2727/2007-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Eastern High Court upheld the District Court's decision to reject the engineering firm's request to question the Disciplinary Board for Accountants. The firm sought to challenge the board's inquiry procedures, but the court found no merit in their arguments regarding the admissibility of the questions. Consequently, the court determined that the disciplinary process proceeded correctly and the appeal was without legal basis.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sections 10 and 11 of the Act on the Disciplinary Board for Accountants; The court holds that a party may not challenge the substantive questions posed by a disciplinary board if they fall within the board's statutory authority to investigate professional misconduct.

Keywords

AI generated
Disciplinary Board for Accountants Professional misconduct inquiry Appeal against disciplinary decision Accounting firm regulation Questioning authority limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sections 10 and 11 of the Act on the Disciplinary Board for Accountants
AI generated
BS-154/2007-ODE
Court dismisses inquiry request to disciplinary board as it requires fact-finding beyond board's competence.
SS-3369/2024-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against city court decision due to insufficient interpretation requiring remand for retrial.
SS-3007/2008-OLR
Court dismisses deprivation of Danish citizenship and deportation due to strong ties to Denmark and risk of double jeopardy abroad.
BS-2622/2007-OLR
Appeal dismissed; lower court's decision on appointing a lay judge is upheld as no new grounds exist.
BS-1500/2008-VLR
Vestre Landsret dismisses appeal, remanding case to determine if procedural safeguards were violated.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæster byrettens kendelse, og tiltræder dermed at det ikke tillades sagsøger at stille spørgsmål til Disciplinærnævnet for Revisorer som formuleret i udkastet til spørgetema

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog med kendelse (2 sider) UDSKRIFT AF ØSTRE LANDSRETS RETSBOG ____________

Den 8. januar 2008 holdt Østre Landsret møde i retsbygningen, Bredgade 59, København.

Som dommere fungerede landsdommerne Lyngesen, Karen-Anke Tørring og Jane Hansen (kst.), førstnævnte som rettens formand.

Som protokolfører fungerede Medarbejder ved retten.

Der foretoges

6. afd. kære nr. B-2727-07: Ingeniørfirmaet Kærende, tidligere Sagsøger (advokat Troels Miltoft) mod Indkærede, tidligere Sagsøgte (advokat Hans Henrik Banke).

Ingen var mødt eller indkaldt.

Der fremlagdes kæreskrift af 20. december 2007, hvorved Ingeniørfirmaet Kærende, tidligere Sagsøger har kæret Odense Rets kendelse af 11. december 2007 (BS 3-154/2007) om spørgsmål til Disciplinærnævnet for Revisorer, dommerens fremsendelsesbrev af 21. december 2007 og udskrift af retsbogen indeholdende den kærede afgørelse.

Der fremlagdes endvidere processkrift af 28. december 2007 fra indkærede.

/

Dommeren har ved fremsendelsesskrivelse af 21. december 2007 henholdt sig til den truf-ne afgørelse.

De modtagne bilag var til stede.

Efter votering afsagdes sålydende

k e n d e l s e:

Af de grunde, der er anført af byretten, b e s t e m m e s:

Byrettens kendelse stadfæstes.

Retten hævet.

/ /