Court dismissed claim for extra parking fees on private land due to lack of clear signage.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request for additional parking fees based on a prolonged unauthorized stay on private property. The plaintiff argued that the lack of explicit signage regarding specific fee conditions constituted a breach of transparency, while the defendant maintained that general parking rules were sufficient notice. The court ruled that the existing signage adequately informed users of the general conditions, thereby negating the claim for extra charges.