Legislator Case Law & Legislation
BS-2655/2002-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000000407 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal allowing documents to be presented as evidence was not unilaterally obtained.

Case Number BS-2655/2002-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Vestre Landsret dismissed the appeal regarding the presentation of documents 2-4 in a construction dispute. The lower court had refused to allow these documents because they were not unilaterally obtained by the appellant. The appellate court upheld this decision, ruling that the refusal was justified as the documents were not properly gathered by the opposing party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 240 af Byggeries Aelkenavrs lovgivning; The court held that documents may not be presented as evidence if they have not been unilaterally obtained by the party requesting them.

Keywords

AI generated
construction dispute evidence presentation unilateral acquisition appeal dismissal document admissibility
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Bilag 2-4 tillades fremlagt under sagen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (3 sider) Den 17. december 2OO2 kl . 9.00 blev Vestre Landsret sat pa ElngsEedet. i Vi.borg af landsdommerne KirsE.en Thorup, Kristi- .rn Pet.ersen og Anni Brix (ksE,. ) med Anonvmisere son ret.s - sekretar.

Der f oret.oges :

v.L. 8-2655-02

BredkjErvejens Murer & BeEon Aps mod lndkarede 1

og tndkerede 2

Kareskrifc af 5. novemb er 2002 fra advokat N.C. SErauss med kare af kendelse vedrorende fremlaggelse af bilag 2-4 afsagE af Retten i Skanderborg, 2. afdeling, den 24. oktober 2002.

Fremsendelsesskrivelse af 6. november 2002 fra ReEt.en i Skanderborg, 2. afdeling.

UdskrifE af reEsbogen for Ret.t.en i Skanderborg. 2. afdeling.

Karesvarskri ft af 22. november 2oo2 fra advokat. Henrik car- Iik Jensen.

sagens bilag var E.il s t.ede .

Der afsagdes f@Igende K e n d e 1 s e:

Sage[ er indbragt for ByggerieEs AEkenavr af de indkarede, og ankenewnets kendelse (bi1ag 2) samE. de to sk@nserklaringer (bilag 3 og 4) er ikke ensidigE indhenteE af karende.

Fremlaggelse af bilagene, der ogsA har betydning for opgarelsen af parternes pAstande, kan ikke anses for at vare overf ladig bevisforelse.

Da freml.aggelse af bilagene ikke prajudicerer en ny synsog skansmands besvarelse under et eventuelt, indeureEligt synog skon, b e s t e m m e s:

Bilag 2 - 4 Eillades fremlagt under sagen.

I(eremileEs omkos cninger ophaves .

Kareafgiften t.ilbagebeE,ales til karende.

sagen s IuE.Eet. .

R e E t e n h e v e E.

Kirsten Thorup Sagsbehandler

cfr.

j

Uden beEaling.

Udskriftens rigtighed bekraftes. Vestre Landsret, Viborg, den 17. december 2002

Anonymiseret

retssekreter