Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-6627/2008-KBH AI generated

Court allows judgment on plaintiff's claim due to defendant's failure to meet final written response deadline.

Case Number BS-6627/2008-KBH
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court decided to grant a judgment in favor of the plaintiff because the defendant failed to meet the deadline for submitting a final written response. The plaintiff's attorney argued that the procedural default entitled the court to rule immediately, while the defendant did not appear or respond. Consequently, the court ruled that a judgment could be issued pursuant to the relevant procedural law section.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 352; If a party fails to comply with the deadline for a final written response, the court may issue a judgment in accordance with the plaintiff's claim.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural default final written response judgment on default civil procedure deadline compliance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 352
Hvis fristen ikke overholdes, kan retten afsige dom i overensstemmelse med sagsøgerens påstand, jf. retsplejelovens § 352.
AI generated
BS-1327/2009-OLR
Appeal dismissed; court upholds lower court's decision to award judgment due to missed reply deadline.
BS-1466/2008-ODE
Civil suit dismissed because defendant failed to submit process papers by the court-set deadline.
SS-581/2010-KOL
Court dismissed request to extend probation period due to failure to meet supervision conditions.
SKS-1886/2009-HIL
Court dismisses lawsuit filed after bankruptcy court deadline expires, citing lack of authority to proceed.
BS-1272/2008-KBH
Civil suit dismissed because plaintiff failed to file reply brief within the statutory deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rettens beslutning om, at der kan afsiges dom efter sagsøgers påstand, såfremt frist for endeligt svarskrift ikke overholdes

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog (1 sider) Københavns Byret

Den 30. april 2009 kl. 10:00 blev retten sat i retssal 19 af Dommer.

Der blev foretaget i ikke offentligt retsmøde sag nr. BS 19C-6627/2008:

Sagsøger (Andelsboligforening)

mod Sagsøgte Adresse København

Ingen indkaldt eller mødt.

Der fremlagdes skrivelse af 24. april 2009 fra sagsøgtes advokat og skrivelse af 28. april 2009 fra sagsøgers advokat.

Retten bemærkede, at sagsøger har frafaldet replik, hvorfor retten besluttede ikke at afvise sagen.

Sagsøgtes frist til endeligt svarskrift udsættes til den 20. maj 2009. Det endelige svarskrift skal opfylde kravene til et svarskrift og angive de vidner, som skal afgive forklaring under hovedforhandlingen.

Hvis fristen ikke overholdes, kan retten afsige dom i overensstemmelse med sagsøgerens påstand, jf. retsplejelovens § 352.

Sagsøger skal inden samme frist angive de vidner, som skal afgive forklaring under hovedforhandlingen.

Sagen udsat.

Retten hævet.

Dommer

/ /