Court dismisses claim for costs in a prohibition order case due to lack of procedural standing.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the applicant's claim for costs regarding a prohibition order. The applicant argued that the lower court erred in awarding costs despite the procedural history of the case. The court ruled that the applicant lacked the necessary procedural standing to claim costs in this specific context.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure: Costs may only be claimed by parties with a direct interest in the outcome of the proceedings.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Spørgsmål om sagsomkostninger i forbudsog påbudssag
[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Orientering fra Domsdatabasen: Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag. Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende afgørelser. De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i Domsdatabasen.