Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-1145/2023-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:SS0000000124 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; request to shorten sentence based on EU law exceptions to § 86 and § 29b is rejected.

Case Number SS-1145/2023-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's decision to reject the application for sentence reduction. The applicant argued that the original sentence violated provisions in the Law on the Execution of Certain Criminal Decisions in the European Union. The court determined that the specific grounds for the sentence reduction did not fall within the exceptions outlined in the cited statutes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Straffelovens § 86, stk. 5; Lov om fuldbyrdelse af visse strafferetlige afgørelser i Den Europæiske Union, § 29 b, stk. 2 og 3: A request to shorten a sentence based on these specific statutory exceptions is inadmissible if the sentence does not meet the required criteria.

Keywords

AI generated
sentence reduction EU law exceptions criminal execution appeal dismissal statutory limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Straffelovens § 86, stk. 5
Landsretten stadfæstede byrettens afgørelse, idet anmodningen om genoptagelse af byrettens dom med henblik på berigtigelse ikke angår afkortning af den idømte straf begrundet i forhold omfattet af straffelovens § 86, stk. 5, eller § 29 b, stk.
Lov om fuldbyrdelse af visse strafferetlige afgørelser i Den Europæiske Union, § 29 b, stk. 2 og 3
AI generated
SS-3247/2012-OLR
Court dismisses police officer's appeal for speeding, ruling escape driving was not proportionate.
BS-653/2020-OLR
Appeal court dismisses request to reopen case due to lack of legal basis for correcting procedural error.
BS-397/2011-OLR
Appeal court upholds lower court's decision to reopen a small claims case after default judgment. The court confirms the general right to request case reopening under the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision clarifies that small claims rules do not exclude the general reopening provision. The court notes the defendant requested reopening within the statutory time limit. The appeal court affirms the lower court's ruling on reopening the proceedings.
BS-2735/2007-OLR
Land court overturns lower court dismissal due to lack of precise payment amount in demand letter.
SS-1169/2025-VLR
Court dismisses dismissal of charges due to ambiguous police message creating no legitimate expectation of non-prosecution.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæstede byrettens afgørelse, idet anmodningen om genoptagelse af byrettens dom med henblik på berigtigelse ikke angår afkortning af den idømte straf begrundet i forhold omfattet af straffelovens § 86, stk. 5, eller § 29 b, stk. 2 og 3, i lov om fuldbyrdelse af visse strafferetlige afgørelser i Den Europæiske Union

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.