Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-4088/2012-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2022:BS0000000294 AI generated

Court dismisses application to apply Chapter 39 of Civil Procedure Act due to claim exceeding 50,000 DKK.

Case Number BS-4088/2012-KBH
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that the case must proceed without applying Chapter 39 of the Civil Procedure Act because the total claim exceeds 50,000 DKK. The plaintiff filed a claim for payment against two defendants, and the court noted the absence of any summoned or present parties. Consequently, the court determined that the procedural rules for smaller claims did not apply and suspended the case for further handling under standard procedures.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 402; § 401, 2. pkt. og § 400, stk. 1, nr. 1: When a claim exceeds 50,000 DKK, Chapter 39 of the Civil Procedure Act does not apply, and the case proceeds under general rules.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act Chapter 39 application claim amount threshold 50,000 DKK limit procedural suspension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 402
retsplejelovens § 402, jf.
Retsplejelovens § 401, 2. pkt.
Retsplejelovens § 400, stk. 1, nr. 1
AI generated
BS-50950/2020-OLR
Appeal against lower court's refusal to summon witness dismissed due to lack of procedural permission.
SS-638/2009-VLR
Court allows police assistant testimony despite defense objection regarding witness sequence and prior statements.
BS-2394/2007-OLR
Court rules that the party who originally requested witness testimony retains the right to call them in appeal.
BS-672/2008-SON
Court rules a senior executive witness belongs to the defendant's group under the first-to-mill principle exception.
BS-651/2011-VLR
Court allows witness testimony from a person with a prior criminal record under Danish law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om, hvorvidt reglerne i kapitel 39 i retsplejeloven skulle anvendes

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Københavns Byret

Udskrift af retsbogen

Den 7. november 2012 kl. 13:15 blev retten sat på Kontor 30S af Dommer .

Der blev foretaget i offentligt retsmøde sag nr. BS 16B-4088/2012:

Part 1 Adresse 1 København K mod Part A (sagsøgte)

Adresse 2 2300 København S og Part B (sagsøgte)

Adresse 2 2300 København S

Ingen indkaldt eller mødt.

Der fremlagdes stævning og svarskrift.

Der blev afsagt

Kendelse

Da sagsøgte har nedlagt selvstændig påstand om betaling, og da sagens samlede krav herefter overstiger 50.000 kr., besluttede retten, at sagens videre behandling skal ske uden anvendelse af reglerne i kapital 39 i retsplejeloven, jf. retsplejelovens § 402, jf. § 401, 2. pkt. og § 400, stk. 1, nr. 1.

Derfor bestemmes:

Sagens viderebehandling skal ske uden anvendelse af reglerne i kapitel 39 i retsplejeloven.

Sagen udsat.

Retten hævet.

Dommer