Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-229/2022-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2023:SS0000001323 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as late; prosecution failed to meet strict time limits for enforcing Danish sentence.

Case Number SS-229/2022-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the prosecution's appeal against the non-enforcement of a Danish sentence. The prosecution argued that the appeal was timely, but the court found it was filed too late under the EU sentence enforcement law. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural deadline had expired, preventing the enforcement of the foreign judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4; retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1: Appeals against decisions on the enforcement of foreign sentences must be lodged within strict statutory time limits, and failure to comply results in the dismissal of the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
EU sentence enforcement procedural time limits appeal dismissal foreign judgment Danish criminal law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4
EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4, jf.
retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1
retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1
AI generated
SS-483/2009-OLR
Appeal dismissed because prosecution failed to meet strict deadline for filing appeal against defendant.
BS-51637/2023-OLR
Appeal dismissed because lawyer lacked court access, but appeal allowed due to timely acceptance via email.
SS-1995/2008-OLR
Appeal after deadline dismissed because defendant was present at verdict and notified of appeal rules.
BS-1923/2016-OLR
Appeal allowed because digital filing after office hours counts as timely under new statute.
BS-1332/2008-OLR
Court allows ancillary party to submit lower court partial decision to resolve procedural prerequisite.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten afviste tiltaltes anke som for sent indgivet i sag om fuldbyrdelse af dom i Danmark, jf. EU-straffuldbyrdelseslovens § 54 a, stk. 4, jf. retsplejelovens § 910, stk. 1

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.