Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-827/2011-VLR AI generated

Court dismisses request for oral hearing on continued detention under Alien Act without statutory link to pre-trial detention rules.

Case Number SS-827/2011-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Vestre Landsret decided that the defendant's request for an oral hearing on continued detention would not be heard. The defendant argued for oral proceedings, but the court noted that the Alien Act's detention provision does not reference pre-trial detention rules. Consequently, the court applied Chapter 85 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs such appeals, and denied the oral hearing request under Section 972 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 50, paragraph 2 of the Alien Act; Section 972, paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure: Appeals for continued detention under the Alien Act are governed by Chapter 85 of the Code of Civil Procedure, not pre-trial detention rules, and thus do not automatically require an oral hearing.

Keywords

AI generated
continued detention Alien Act oral hearing request Code of Civil Procedure pre-trial detention rules Vestre Landsret immigration detention

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 50, paragraph 2 of the Alien Act
april 2011 har byretten afsagt kendelse om fortsat frihedsberøvelse af Sigtede i medfør af udlændingelovens § 50, stk.
Section 972, paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
retsplejelovens § 972, stk.
Chapter 85 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
BS-174/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; oral hearing required over written declaration request under Civil Procedure Act s. 297.
BS-831/2010-OLR
Appeal dismissed; no oral hearing required and prior court decision lacks suspensive effect under immigration law.
BS-2836/2008-OLR
Appeal dismissed; court upholds parole denial due to high recidivism risk and disciplinary record.
BS-2521/2014-OLR
Appeal against transfer of case dismissed due to lack of Process Permission Board approval under new procedural law.
BS-36057/2020-VLR
Court allows expert opinion and document in civil case regarding damages assessment scope.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten besluttede, at kæremålet ikke skal forhandles mundtligt, jf. retsplejelovens § 972, stk. 2

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog (2 sider) Vestre Landsret holdt den 9. april 2011 kl. 11.00 møde på tingstedet i Viborg.

Som dommere fungerede landsdommerne Bjerg Hansen, John Lundum og Dorte Jensen.

Som retssekretær fungerede Medarbejder ved retten.

V.L. S–0827-11

Anklagemyndigheden mod Sigtede, født Dato 1980

Fremlagte bilag:

Udskrift af retsbogen for Retten i Viborg med bilag.

Den 8. april 2011 har byretten afsagt kendelse om fortsat frihedsberøvelse af Sigtede i medfør af udlændingelovens § 50, stk. 2.

Kendelsen er kæret af Sigtede, som har begæret kæremålet forhandlet mundtligt.

Landsretten finder ikke, at Sigtede har krav på mundtlig forhandling af kæremålet om fortsat frihedsberøvelse, idet udlændingelovens § 50, stk. 2, ikke henviser til lovens § 35 eller retsplejelovens bestemmelser om varetægtsfængsling, og idet det i udlændingelovens § 50, stk. 3, er bestemt, at kære sker efter reglerne i retsplejelovens kapitel 85.

Landsretten besluttede, at kæremålet ikke skal forhandles mundtligt, jf. retsplejelovens § 972, stk. 2, og fastsatte frist til den 14. april 2011 for advokat Claus Bonnez til eventuelt at fremkomme med et skriftligt indlæg om kæremålet.

Sagen udsat.

Bjerg Hansen