Court dismisses appeal regarding police letter and visit control legality after pre-trial detention. Police argued necessity for security; court found no violation. Appeal dismissed due to lack of procedural error.

The court dismissed the appeal challenging the legality of police letter and visit controls conducted after the defendant's pre-trial detention. The police argued these measures were necessary for security and investigation purposes, while the defendant claimed they violated privacy rights. The court ruled that the controls were lawful given the context of pre-trial detention and the absence of procedural flaws.