SS-16582/2010-KBH
ECLI:DK:KBH:2023:SS0000001042
AI generated
Court dismisses request for defense lawyer appointment during police interrogation due to lack of statutory grounds.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the applicant's request to appoint a defense lawyer during a police interrogation. The applicant argued that legal representation was necessary to protect their rights during the questioning process. However, the court ruled that no statutory obligation exists to provide a lawyer in this specific procedural stage.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedStraffesagens lovgivning; Forsvarerbeskikelsesloven: A defense lawyer is not automatically appointed during police interrogations unless specific statutory conditions regarding the suspect's mental state or lack of understanding are met.
Keywords
AI generated
police interrogation
defense lawyer appointment
criminal procedure
police questioning
legal representation
statutory grounds
procedural rights
Cited Legislation
AI generatedForsvarerbeskikelsesloven
Related Decisions
AI generatedSS-2425/2010-OLR
High court upholds lower court's refusal to appoint defense counsel for two officers in a criminal case.
SS-101465/2025-LYN
Defense counsel notification of trial date dismissed as not required by law for this case type.
SS-12149/2012-GLO
Court orders police to release case files to defense lawyer despite prior refusal.
SS-51/2025-OLR
Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer not appointed as suspect remains under investigation without formal charge.
SS-5184/2008-GLO
Court denies defense lawyer's request for client's presence at trial as witness due to lack of future prosecution. Defense argues for right to observe proceedings; court rejects based on no evidence use. Decision upholds witness exclusion under procedural law.
Full text
Sag om beskikkelse af forsvarer i forbindelse med afhøring