Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-2412/2008-FRB ECLI:DK:FRB:2023:BS0000001186 AI generated

Case dismissed because plaintiff failed to disclose a valid address as required by statute.

Case Number BS-2412/2008-FRB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the case because the plaintiff failed to provide a valid personal address in the summons. Although the plaintiff initially listed a London address, the court determined this was merely a business account address and the plaintiff did not comply with the court's order to correct the information. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural defect rendered the case inadmissible under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 348, stk. 2, nr. 1; § 349, stk. 1: A case must be dismissed if the plaintiff fails to disclose a valid address in the summons and does not comply with the court's order to correct the defect.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure valid address requirement procedural defect dismissal summons compliance business address invalidity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 348, stk. 2, nr. 1
Det fremgår af retsplejelovens § 348, stk. 2, nr. 1, at stævningen skal indeholde sagsøgerens adresse.
Retsplejelovens § 349, stk. 1
retsplejelovens § 349, stk. 1.
AI generated
BS-633/2017-KOL
Court denies transfer to Copenhagen Court as Kolding Court is the exclusive competent court under Brussels I Regulation.
BS-43527/2022-FRB
Court dismisses case where plaintiff company ceased to exist before filing suit due to lack of standing.
BS-747/2008-LYN
Civil court dismissed case due to insufficient defendant address in summons under RPL § 349.
BS-1289/2008-OLR
Civil appeal dismissed because inaccurate defendant address prevented service of process under Danish Code of Civil Procedure.
BS-1451/2007-FRB
Court dismisses duplicate lawsuit claiming new evidence exists after previous case was settled. Plaintiff failed to prove new material facts. Court upholds dismissal based on settlement agreement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag afvist, da sagsøgeren ikke har oplyst sin adresse

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog med kendelse (2 sider) Retten på Frederiksberg

Udskrift af retsbogen

Den 5. marts 2009 kl. 15:30 blev retten sat i Retssal F, Howitzvej af Dommer.

Der blev foretaget i ikke offentligt retsmøde sag nr. BS F-2412/2008:

Sagsøger Adresse 1 London England mod Sagsøgte Adresse 2 2000 Frederiksberg

Ingen indkaldt eller mødt.

Der fremlagdes replik med bilag 5 og duplik, begge vedrørende sagsøgtes påstande i svarskriftet.

Retten bemærker, at sagsøgeren i replikken har fastholdt ikke at oplyse sin adresse, og at den i stævningen anførte adresse er en kontoadresse.

Der afsagdes

K E N D E L S E:

Det fremgår af retsplejelovens § 348, stk. 2, nr. 1, at stævningen skal indeholde sagsøgerens adresse. Da dette ikke er tilfældet, og da sagsøgeren ikke har efterkommet opfordring til berigtigelse, vil sagen være at afvise, jf. retsplejelovens § 349, stk. 1. Med sagsomkostninger forholdes som nedenfor bestemt.

T h i b e s t e m m e s:

Denne sag afvises.

Inden 14 dage skal sagsøgeren betale til sagsøgte sagens omkostninger med 10.000 kr.

Sagen sluttet.

Retten hævet.

STD060328-S01-ST01-K181.04-T2-L01-M00-P01-\R11 Side 2/2

Dommer

STD060328-S01-ST01-K181.04-T2-L01-M00-P01-\R11