Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-38353/2020-SHR ECLI:DK:SHR:2023:BS0000003672 AI generated

Trademark infringement claim dismissed due to defendant's passive conduct and lack of market reputation.

Case Number BS-38353/2020-SHR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request for a temporary injunction regarding alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition. The defendant argued that their passive market conduct and lack of established reputation precluded any legal protection. Consequently, the court ruled that without active market presence, the plaintiff could not demonstrate the necessary conditions for an injunction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Varemærkeloven; Uforretmæssig konkurrenceloven: En passiv markedsføring uden etableret varemærker eller god markedsføringsskik udelukker fremme af midlertidige forbud.

Keywords

AI generated
trademark infringement temporary injunction passive conduct unfair competition market reputation passive advertising protection of rights
AI generated
SS-377/2008-VLR
Court dismisses appeal against fine for violating marketing law provisions on misleading advertising.
BS-2/2013-SHR
Trademark injunction dismissed because plaintiff failed to prove irreparable harm and did not exhaust prior administrative remedies.
BS-62403/2023-SHR
Trademark and copyright infringement claims dismissed due to lack of evidence of market confusion and consumer harm.
BS-45386/2025-OLR
Court dismisses temporary injunctions against new panel brackets due to patent validity doubts.
BS-34936/2022-OLR
Court dismisses defamation claim against private labeling scheme for TV comments and trademark use.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om anmodning om midlertidige forbud baseret på påstået krænkelse af varemærkerettigheder, og god markedsføringsskik blev nægtet fremme under henvisning til forbudsretlig passivitet, samt spørgsmål om rette værneting

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.