Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-1551/2009-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2023:BS0000001178 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's refusal to allow expert driving assessment evidence.

Case Number BS-1551/2009-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Eastern High Court dismissed the appeal against the Helsingør City Court's refusal to permit expert evidence regarding the appellant's driving ability. The appellant, a former litigant, sought an expert evaluation by an authorized driving instructor or traffic accident expert to prove his competence. The lower court rejected this request, and the High Court affirmed this decision without holding a hearing as no party appeared.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Straffelovens § 200; Straffelovens § 201: The court has discretion to admit expert evidence, and such evidence is not automatically required when the facts are sufficiently clear from the existing record or when the proposed expert opinion does not add necessary probative value to the case.

Keywords

AI generated
expert evidence admissibility driving competence assessment discretionary admission traffic accident expert authorized driving instructor appellate review standard procedural exclusion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Straffelovens § 200
Straffelovens § 201
AI generated
BS-3611/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; small claims strict relevance standard prevents new expert evidence from being admissible.
BS-1598/2013-VLR
Court dismisses appeal to replace trial judges with expert members due to lack of relevance.
BS-2055/2011-VLR
Court dismissed appeal on appointment of arbitrator due to lack of statutory grounds for intervention.
BS-569/2014-VLR
Court dismissed appeal against veterinary and transport expert judge appointments in civil proceedings.
BS-3034/2011-OLR
Court allows expert members to join trial to provide technical expertise on mold damage case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæstede byrettens kendelse om, hvorvidt det kunne tillades Appellanten at føre bevis i form af sagkyndig bedømmelse ved autoriseret kørelærer eller motorsagkyndig

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog med kendelse (2 sider) UDSKRIFT AF ØSTRE LANDSRETS RETSBOG ____________

Den 28. juli 2009 holdt Østre Landsret møde i retsbygningen, Bredgade 42, København.

Som dommere fungerede landsdommerne B. Vollmond, Ejler Bruun og Grethe Jørgensen (kst.), førstnævnte som rettens formand.

Som protokolfører fungerede Medarbejder ved retten.

Der foretoges

22. afd. kære nr. B-1551-09: Kærende, tidligere Sagsøger (advokat Ole Rosdahl) mod Nordsjællands Politi

Ingen var mødt eller indkaldt.

Der fremlagdes kæreskrift af 27. maj 2009, hvorved Kærende, tidligere Sagsøger har kæret Helsingør Rets kendelse af 13. maj 2009 (BS 18-687/2009), hvorved hans begæring om tilladelse til at føre bevis i form af en sagkyndig bedømmelse af hans evne til at føre mo-torkøretøj, ikke blev taget til følge, dommerens fremsendelsesbrev af 4. juni 2009 og ud-skrift af retsbogen indeholdende den kærede afgørelse.

Indkærede har ikke udtalt sig vedrørende kæren.

Dommeren har ved sagens fremsendelse henholdt sig til den trufne afgørelse.

/

De modtagne bilag var til stede.

Efter votering afsagdes sålydende

k e n d e l s e:

Af de grunde, som byretten har anført,

b e s t e m m e s:

Byrettens kendelse stadfæstes.

Kæremålsomkostningerne ophæves.

Retten hævet.

/ /