Legislator Case Law & Legislation
BS-1751/2010-HJO ECLI:DK:HJO:2023:BS0000003661 AI generated

Court dismisses request to postpone civil case due to lack of valid grounds for delay.

Case Number BS-1751/2010-HJO
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the defendant's request to postpone the civil proceedings regarding wheelchairs on the property. While the defendant argued that determining the wheelchair placement required time, the plaintiff contested this without providing a valid reason. The court found no legal basis for the delay and ordered the case to proceed to judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Civil Procedure Act; Court Procedure Act: A party must demonstrate valid grounds to postpone proceedings; mere uncertainty about factual details does not constitute sufficient justification for a delay.

Keywords

AI generated
postponement request valid grounds required civil procedure rules property dispute procedural delay
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Beslutning om, hvorvidt sagen kan udsættes eller ej

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) RETTEN I HJORRING

Den l(r. novcmbcr 201 I kl. 09:00 blev rettcn sat af Dommer 1 .

Der blcv firretaget i offentligt retsmode sag nr. BS l-1751,12010:

Sagsøger Adresse 1 By 1 mod Sagsøgte Adresse 2 8400 Ebeltoft

For sagsogeren modte, advokat Mogens Pahl Christensen.

For sagsogte modte, advokat Per Mogensen.

Sagsoger fremlagde:

- Stevning.

- Replik.

- Bilag 1-9.

- Bilag 10.

Sagsogte fremlagde:

- Svarskrift.

- Bilag A

Endvidere fremlagdes fortegnelser.

Sagsogeren, afgav behori gt formanet forklaring

Sagsogte, afgav behorigt formanet forklaring

Vidne 1 , Adresse 3 , By 2 , afgav behorigt formanet forklaring.

Advokat Pcr Mogensor.r arulodcdc om, at sagen udsrttss rned henblik pi, at det kan blive fastlagt, hvorledes hjulsporene er placeret pi grunden.

Advokat Mogens Pahl Christensen protesterede imod det, idet han ikke tandt nogen gn"rndlag for at udsatte sagen.

Retten fandt intet gnrndlag for at udsette sagen

Advokat Per Mogensen tilkendegav, at han karer rettens beslutning.

Sagen procederedes og optoges til dom, der afsiges onsdag den 30. novem- Side 2/2

ber20ll kl. 10.00

Retten hevet

Dommer 1