Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-681/2008-VIB ECLI:DK:VIB:2023:SS0000000724 AI generated

Court denies bail for suspect in serious crime case due to flight risk and public safety concerns.

Case Number SS-681/2008-VIB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court denied the request for bail pending trial, ordering the suspect to remain in pre-trial detention. The prosecution argued the defendant posed a significant flight risk and danger to the public, while the defense claimed the detention was excessive given the circumstances. The court ruled that the statutory criteria for release were not met, prioritizing public safety over the defendant's liberty.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3; § 767, stk. 2: Pre-trial detention may be ordered when there is a substantial risk of flight or danger to the public, and no less restrictive measure is sufficient to ensure the suspect's appearance in court.

Keywords

AI generated
pre-trial detention flight risk assessment public safety concerns bail denial criteria criminal procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3
retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3, subsidiært § 762, stk.
Retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 2, nr. 2
Retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 2, nr. 3
Retsplejelovens § 767, stk. 2
AI generated
SS-471/2010-OLR
Court extends pre-trial detention for two suspects based on their written consent and ongoing investigation.
SS-4595/2023-SON
Court orders pre-trial detention for three defendants under criminal procedure law sections 762(1)(1) and (3).
SS-5705/2007-ARH
Court orders detention pending sentencing for drug trafficking and theft despite short total sentence.
SS-2570/2009-VLR
Court orders continued pre-trial detention for defendant pending final judgment on criminal charges.
SS-14996/2021-GLO
Detention conditions regarding risk of influencing proceedings were not met, leading to dismissal of the application.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kendelse om varetægtsfængsling indtil der er afsagt dom i sagen, jf. retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3, subsidiært § 762, stk. 2, nr. 2, mere subsidiært § 762, stk. 2, nr. 3, jf. § 767, stk. 2