Court holds that applying credit agreement law section 42 precludes subsequent application of section 41.
Denmark (DK)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court upheld the lower court's decision that applying section 42 of the Credit Agreement Act bars the later application of section 41. The plaintiff argued for the applicability of section 41, while the defendant relied on the exclusivity of section 42. The court ruled that the specific provision in section 42 effectively excludes the general provision in section 41 from further application in this context.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCredit Agreement Act section 42, paragraph 2; Credit Agreement Act section 41: The specific provision in section 42, paragraph 2, precludes the subsequent application of the general provision in section 41.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Landsretten stadfæstede fogedrettens kendelse, om, at anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 42, stk. 2, afskærer efterfølgende anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 41
[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)
Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:
Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i kæremålet til denne sag.
Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende
afgørelser.
De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i
Domsdatabasen.