Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
FS-3887/2020-FRB ECLI:DK:FRB:2023:FS0000000016 AI generated

Credit agreement law § 42(2) bars subsequent application of § 41 after a specific notice is given.

Case Number FS-3887/2020-FRB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that the application of Credit Agreement Law § 42(2) precludes the later use of § 41. The plaintiff argued for the application of § 41, while the defendant relied on the exclusionary effect of § 42(2). The court held that once § 42(2) applies, § 41 cannot be invoked subsequently.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Credit Agreement Law § 42, stk. 2; § 41, stk. 1: The application of § 42(2) excludes the subsequent application of § 41.

Keywords

AI generated
Credit Agreement Law statutory exclusion subsequent application legal bar procedural consequence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Credit Agreement Law § 42, stk. 2
Credit Agreement Law § 41, stk. 1
AI generated
BS-1449/1994-VLR
Court dismisses debt obligation defense based on alleged forgery due to appellant's gross negligence.
BS-28/2010-KOL
Court dismisses claim as statute of limitations expired following Vestre Landsret precedent. Claimant failed to prove service of notice on defendant.
BS-1607/2008-HBK
Court orders disclosure of credit assessments to prove debtor's insolvency knowledge for voidable transaction reversal.
BS-74/2019-VLR
Court allows claim to proceed after finding statute of limitations interrupted by 2009 assignment request.
FS-2590/2019-SVE
Limitation interrupted only for the specific amount claimed in the prior enforcement request under Danish law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 42, stk. 2, afskærer efterfølgende anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 41

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Orientering fra Domsdatabasen: Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i kæremålet til denne sag. Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende afgørelser. De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i Domsdatabasen.