Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-3247/2021-SVE ECLI:DK:SVE:2023:SS0000000548 AI generated

Court upheld continued remand detention and warrant issuance as not disproportionate or futile.

Case Number SS-3247/2021-SVE
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that continued remand detention under the Home Return Act and the issuance of a warrant were not disproportionate or futile. The prosecution argued that less intrusive measures were insufficient to ensure the suspect's appearance, while the defense contended otherwise. The court rejected these arguments, finding the coercive measures legally justified given the circumstances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Hjemrejselovens § 14, stk. 1, nr. 1; Udsendelseslovens § 10: Continued remand detention and warrant issuance are permissible if less intrusive measures are insufficient and the measures are not disproportionate or futile.

Keywords

AI generated
remand detention home return act proportionality test warrant issuance coercive measures futility assessment criminal procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Hjemrejselovens § 14, stk. 1, nr. 1
Byretten fandt, at en fortsat varetægtsfængsling efter hjemrejselovens § 14, stk. 1, nr. 1, ikke var uproportional, og at en udsendelse ikke var udsigtsløs.
Udsendelseslovens § 10
AI generated
SS-2854/2022-OLR
Landsret upheld pretrial detention of an asylum seeker as proportional despite Højesteret's prior ruling.
SS-699/2021-OLR
Appeal dismissed; detention of foreign national continued due to lack of alternative measures and case urgency.
SS-3267/2010-OLR
Court upholds detention until deportation without a set term when the deportation order is not yet final.
SS-23084/2010-KBH
Det domstol afviser varetægtsfængsling indtil udvisning, da der ikke er grundlag for tvivl om fremtidig udvisning.
SS-5057/2016-KBH
Court ruled detention of Romanian migrant lawful and continued under immigration law provisions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Byretten fandt, at en fortsat varetægtsfængsling efter hjemrejselovens § 14, stk. 1, nr. 1, ikke var uproportional, og at en udsendelse ikke var udsigtsløs. Mindre indgribende foranstaltninger var ikke tilstrækkelige

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har truffet kendelse i kæremålet til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.