SS-114/2011-VLR
ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:SS0000000536
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal regarding request to split extract for naming in criminal case.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Vestre Landsret upheld the lower court's decision rejecting the defendant's request to split the extract for naming. The defendant argued that the extract was too long for the specific purpose of naming, while the prosecution maintained the original format was appropriate. The court determined that the procedural requirements for splitting the document were not met under the relevant regulations.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedStraffesagens lovgivning; Afgørelse om opdeling af ekstrakt til nævning: An appeal to split a criminal extract for naming purposes is dismissed if the original document meets statutory requirements and the request lacks sufficient justification.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal extract
naming procedure
document splitting
appeal decision
Vestre Landsret
Cited Legislation
AI generatedStraffesagens lovgivning
Related Decisions
AI generatedBS-186/2010-OLR
Port authority wins arrest and lien claims against shipowner; shipowner freed from liability for damages.
BS-2687/2010-OLR
Court upholds dismissal of appeal regarding failure to respond to court order in small claims procedure. Novasol A/S v. Indkærede, 2010. Small claims procedure. Court order. Failure to respond. Dismissed appeal. Small claims. Court order. Failure to respond. Dismissed appeal.
BS-2496/2013-VLR
Civil case remitted to district court for preliminary assessment of whether it is of general legal principle. The court found the case not suitable for immediate ruling. The decision was based on the need for further factual clarification. The court remitted the case to the lower court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court determined that the case requires further factual clarification before a final decision can be made. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court found that the case is not yet suitable for a final ruling. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court determined that the case requires further factual clarification before a final decision can be made. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court found that the case is not yet suitable for a final ruling.
BS-3046/2010-OLR
Court dismisses request for expert appraisal due to insufficient evidence from 13 photos and one report.
BS-1658/2007-VLR
Bank allowed to claim dividend from guarantor despite post-liquidation payment under bankruptcy law.
Full text
Byrettens afgørelse stadfæstet i sag vedrørende anmodning om opdeling af ekstrakt til nævninge