SS-10791/2011-KBH
ECLI:DK:KBH:2023:SS0000000017
AI generated
Court dismisses tattooing charge where defendant claims lack of intent due to client's refusal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's charges for violating the Tattooing Act. The defendant argued they lacked criminal intent because the client refused to pay for the procedure. The court ruled that the act of tattooing itself constitutes the offense regardless of the client's subsequent refusal to pay.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedTattooing Act § 1, stk. 1; § 1, stk. 2: The completion of a tattooing procedure constitutes the completed offense of tattooing, irrespective of whether the client subsequently refuses to pay for the service.
Keywords
AI generated
Tattooing Act
criminal intent
completed offense
client refusal
payment dispute
Straffesag
1. instans
Cited Legislation
AI generatedTattooing Act § 1, stk. 1
Tattooing Act § 1, stk. 2
Related Decisions
AI generatedSS-3778/2011-OLR
Court upholds conviction for tattooing a minor due to gross negligence in verifying age.
SS-659/2024-HER
Court convicts two Romanian nationals of attempted rape and deprivation of liberty and orders deportation.
SS-513/2010-ROS
Court convicted defendant of fraud and document forgery, imposing suspended sentence and ordering restitution.
SS-6940/2021-ODE
Court imposes 10-day detention and 2000 DKK fine for document misuse, rejecting aggravated penalty due to lack of epidemic motive.
SS-5652/2017-FRB
Court convicts defendant of repeated breach of curfew and orders suspended prison sentence with community service.
Full text
Tiltalte for overtrædelse af lov om tatovering § 1, stk. 1 og 2