BS-2873/2010-ARH
ECLI:DK:ARH:2022:BS0000004769
AI generated
Court dismisses request for child interview in custody arrangement due to lack of necessity.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the applicant's request to conduct a child interview as part of the custody arrangement. The applicant argued that the child's views were essential for determining the best interests of the child, while the opposing party contended that existing evidence sufficed. The court ruled that no additional interview was necessary given the established facts and the child's age.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedBørneloven § 16; Børneloven § 17: A child interview is not mandatory if existing evidence adequately addresses the child's best interests and the child's age precludes meaningful participation.
Keywords
AI generated
child custody arrangement
child interview necessity
best interests of child
family law procedure
court discretion
Cited Legislation
AI generatedBørneloven § 16
Børneloven § 17
Related Decisions
AI generatedBS-2514/2008-SON
Court dismisses request for child interview in parental responsibility case due to lack of necessity.
BS-697/2011-VLR
Court dismisses appeal regarding child interview in custody arrangement, upholding lower court's decision.
BS-47455/2021-OLR
Appeal dismissed; High Court upholds lower court's custody visitation order between father and children.
BS-1382/2009-VLR
Court of Appeal overturns lower court ruling requiring child interview in parental responsibility case.
BS-2721/2008-ALB
Court denies mother's request for sole parental authority over a 16-year-old child due to the child's severe needs and current placement.
Full text
Sag om, hvorvidt der skal gennemføres børnesamtale i forbindelse med samværsordning