Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-50950/2020-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2022:BS0000004047 AI generated

Appeal against lower court's refusal to summon witness dismissed due to lack of procedural permission.

Case Number BS-50950/2020-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the lower court's decision to exclude a witness from the main hearing. The appellant argued for the witness's testimony, but the lower court had already ruled that no interrogation would occur during the main proceedings. The appeal was rejected because the appellant failed to obtain the necessary permission from the Procedure Permission Board required to challenge a decision made during the preparation phase of the main trial.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 389 a; A decision on whether to summon a witness for the main hearing made during the preparation phase can only be appealed with permission from the Procedure Permission Board; without such permission, the appeal is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural permission witness summons main hearing preparation phase appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 389 a
AI generated
BS-39602/2020-LYN
Court dismisses witness request because the individual is deemed a party representative without significant evidentiary value.
BS-4088/2012-KBH
Court dismisses application to apply Chapter 39 of Civil Procedure Act due to claim exceeding 50,000 DKK.
BS-2394/2007-OLR
Court rules that the party who originally requested witness testimony retains the right to call them in appeal.
SS-638/2009-VLR
Court allows police assistant testimony despite defense objection regarding witness sequence and prior statements.
BS-8419/2018-OLR
Appeal dismissed because no permission from the Procedure Permission Board exists for the lower court's ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kæremål om, hvorvidt en person skal afgive vidneforklaring, afvist

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog (3 sider) ØSTRE LANDSRET RETSBOG

Den 19. januar 2021 holdt Østre Landsret møde i retsbygningen i København.

Landsdommerne Finn Morten Andersen, Jacob Waage og Pernille Buck Bendt-son (kst.) behandlede sagen.

Sag BS-50950/2020-OLR (7. afdeling)

Kærende, tidligere Sagsøgte

mod

EuroPark A/S (EUROINCASSO ApS)

Ved kendelse af 29. december 2020 har Retten i Lyngby (sag BS-39602/2020- LYN) bestemt, at der under hovedforhandlingen ikke skal ske afhøring af Person som vidne.

Kærende, tidligere Sagsøgte har kæret afgørelsen.

EuroPark A/S har påstået kæremålet afvist.

Landsretten afsagde

KENDELSE

Byrettens afgørelse er truffet under forberedelsen af hovedforhandlingen. Afgø-relsen kan derfor kun kæres med tilladelse fra Procesbevillingsnævnet, jf. rets-plejelovens § 389 a. Da en sådan tilladelse ikke foreligger, afviser landsretten kæremålet.

/

THI BESTEMMES:

Dette kæremål afvises.

I sagsomkostninger for landsretten skal Kærende, tidligere Sagsøgte inden 14 dage betale 2.000 kr. til EuroPark A/S. Beløbet forrentes efter rentelovens § 8 a.

Sagen sluttet.

/ /