Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-39602/2020-LYN ECLI:DK:LYN:2022:BS0000004213 AI generated

Court dismisses witness request because the individual is deemed a party representative without significant evidentiary value.

Case Number BS-39602/2020-LYN
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court denied the defendant's request for the plaintiff's representative to give testimony during the main hearing. The plaintiff successfully argued that the individual is a party representative, while the defendant failed to prove the testimony's relevance. Consequently, the court ruled that no hearing should occur under the cited procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 403; A party representative's testimony is inadmissible if the opposing party protests and the court finds the evidence lacks significance for the case.

Keywords

AI generated
party representative witness testimony hearing exclusion procedural law evidentiary value

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 403
Henset til det af sagsøger anførte, samt at det af sagsøgte anførte ikke dokumentere at denne bevisførelse er af betydning for sagen kan retten ikke godken-de at der skal ske afhøring af Person under dennes protest, jf. retsplejelovens § 403.
AI generated
SS-2848/2017-HRS
Court orders witness to testify despite defense appeal, citing procedural necessity under Criminal Procedure Act.
BS-50950/2020-OLR
Appeal against lower court's refusal to summon witness dismissed due to lack of procedural permission.
BS-2394/2007-OLR
Court rules that the party who originally requested witness testimony retains the right to call them in appeal.
SS-638/2009-VLR
Court allows police assistant testimony despite defense objection regarding witness sequence and prior statements.
BS-2385/2010-VIB
Witness testimony by a person under 18 without parental consent is inadmissible in Danish criminal proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sagen drejer sig om begæring indgivet af sagsøgte om, hvorvidt en person skal afgive vidneforklaring

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog med kendelse (4 sider) RETTEN I LYNGBY RETSBOG

Den 29. december 2020 kl. 10.00 holdt Retten i Lyngby offentligt retsmøde i rets-bygningen.

Dommer behandlede sagen.

Sag BS-39602/2020-LYN

EuroPark A/S (EUROINCASSO ApS)

mod

Sagsøgte

Retten afsagde

KENDELSE

Sagsøgte har indgivet begæring om, at Person, Stilling for sagsøger, skal afgive vidneforklaring.

Sagsøger har protesteret herimod og herunder anført, at Person, er at anse som partsrepræsentant.

Henset til det af sagsøger anførte, samt at det af sagsøgte anførte ikke dokumentere at denne bevisførelse er af betydning for sagen kan retten ikke godken-de at der skal ske afhøring af Person under dennes protest, jf. retsplejelovens § 403.

/ THI BESTEMMES:

Der skal under hovedforhandlingen ikke ske afhøring af Person.

Sagen udsat.

/ / /