BS-2867/2010-ALB
ECLI:DK:ALB:2022:BS0000002747
AI generated
Court dismisses request for additional expert opinion when original assessment was sufficient and timely.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's request to obtain a supplementary expert opinion. The plaintiff argued the initial assessment was incomplete, while the defendant contended the original evaluation was adequate. The court ruled that since the initial opinion was timely and sufficient, no further expert review was legally necessary.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSocial Security Act; Social Security Act: When an initial expert assessment is timely and sufficient, a request for a supplementary opinion must be dismissed unless new evidence emerges.
Keywords
AI generated
social security assessment
supplementary expert opinion
timeliness of review
sufficiency of evidence
administrative procedure
Related Decisions
AI generatedSS-1457/2008-VLR
Appeal against pre-trial ruling on expert opinion dismissed as no new facts or arguments presented.
BS-3611/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; small claims strict relevance standard prevents new expert evidence from being admissible.
BS-122/2011-HIL
Court rejects plaintiff's request for expert members during trial due to lack of independent expert evidence.
BS-2055/2011-VLR
Court dismissed appeal on appointment of arbitrator due to lack of statutory grounds for intervention.
BS-14/2006-RAN
Court allows appointment of new expert after original expert's death in civil case.
Full text
Sag om, hvorvidt sagsøger gives tilladelse til at indhente yderligere skønserklæring