Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-41794/2021-HJR ECLI:DK:HJR:2022:BS0000001021 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to suspend proceedings for appeal to Family Board in custody case.

Case Number BS-41794/2021-HJR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the father's request to suspend proceedings before the Family Board regarding a custody appeal. The court found no legal basis to grant suspensive effect to the application for leave to appeal. Consequently, the lower court's decision on custody remains effective while the appeal is pending.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejeloven § 456 a; Retsplejeloven § 456 b: An application for leave to appeal does not automatically suspend the proceedings of the lower court unless specific statutory conditions are met.

Keywords

AI generated
suspensive effect leave to appeal family board custody dispute procedural suspension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejeloven § 456 a
Retsplejeloven § 456 b
AI generated
BS-12957/2022-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal to refer case to district court as it lacks general legal significance.
BS-38860/2021-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal to remand tax case to District Court as lower court ruling is upheld.
BS-237/1999-HJR
Højesteret dismissed the appeal because the appellant lacked required permission from the Process Permission Board under the Code of Civil Procedure.
BS-47330/2024-ARH
Court dismisses appeal and remands case to lower court for further proceedings on asylum claim.
BS-561/2013-OLR
Land's court overturns probate court ruling, ordering executor to sell mortgaged property despite no bids.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Højesteret afviste anmodning om at tillægge ansøgning til Procesbevillingsnævnet opsættende virkning og afviste samtidig at beskikke parternes advokater under andragendets behandling

[DOKUMENT] Dom (3 sider) HØJESTERET RETSBOG Sagen er behandlet for lukkede døre.

Den 11. november 2021 blev Højesteret sat i retsbygningen, Prins Jørgens Gård 13, 1218 København K.

Ankeudvalgets formand, Jan Schans Christensen, behandlede sagen.

Sag BS-41794/2021-HJR

Mulig far 2 (advokat Henrik Brunsgaard Dreyer)

mod

Mulig far 1 (advokat Christina Neugebauer)

Andre parter: Mor (advokat Martin Andersen)

Barn, født den Dato 2012 (advokat Poul Jost Jensen)

Mulig far 2 har ansøgt Procesbevillingsnævnet om tilladelse til at anke Østre Landsrets dom af 14. oktober 2021 (BS-9027/2020-OLR) om faderskabet til Barn og har anmodet Højesteret om at tillægge an-søgningen til Procesbevillingsnævnet opsættende virkning.

/

Ankeudvalgets formand, Jan Schans Christensen, besluttede, at anmodningen ikke imødekommes, idet der ikke er grundlag for at tillægge ansøgningen om anketilladelse opsættende virkning.

Advokat Henrik Brunsgaard Dreyer, advokat Christina Neugebauer og advokat Poul Jost Jensen har anmodet om beskikkelse under andragendets behandling. Der findes ikke at være behov herfor under behandlingen af dette, jf. retspleje-lovens § 456 g. Ankeudvalgets formand besluttede derfor, at anmodningerne om beskikkelse ikke imødekommes.

Sagen sluttet.

Retten hævet.

/ /