Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-1056/2014-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2022:BS0000002492 AI generated

Court upholds rules excluding lawyer-client correspondence from expert witness reports and deliverables.

Case Number BS-1056/2014-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court confirmed the previous rulings regarding guidelines for impartial expert witnesses with a specific modification. The key change mandates that correspondence between the plaintiff companies and the expert's lawyers must be excluded from both the expert's report and any documents delivered to the opposing party. This decision ensures that confidential legal communications remain protected from disclosure during the litigation process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; Section 12 of the Rules of Civil Procedure: Confidential communications between parties and their legal counsel must be excluded from impartial expert witness reports and documents delivered to the opposing party to preserve professional privilege.

Keywords

AI generated
impartial expert witness lawyer client correspondence professional privilege correspondence exclusion civil procedure rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Rules of Civil Procedure
Section 12 of the Rules of Civil Procedure
AI generated
BS-569/2002-SKA
Court allows expert appraisal documents in arbitration unless arbitration rules explicitly prohibit them.
BS-1403/2007-SON
Court dismisses edition request against bankruptcy estate citing financial secrecy law and lack of statutory basis.
BS-1970/2011-OLR
Court grants access to prior criminal records in one case but denies it in others based on acquittal status.
BS-109/2008-RAN
Court allows witness statements but excludes unilateral expert declaration from plaintiff.
BS-549/2011-HOL
Court dismisses late expert report but allows photos as evidence in construction defect dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Tidligere påkærede kendelser om retningslinjer og søgekriterier for uvildig sagkyndigs arbejde stadfæstes med den ændring, at dokumenter, der udgør korrespondance mellem hhv. kærende A/S 1 og dette selskabs advokat og kærende A/S 2 og dette selskabs advokat, skal undtages fra såvel rapporterne som de dokumenter, der udleveres til Indkærede ApS.