Court of Appeal orders three judges to hear case instead of two per law.
Denmark (DK)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal reversed the District Court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of a quorum. The District Court had ruled that only two judges were needed, but the appellate court found this violated the requirement for three judges. Consequently, the case must now be heard by a full panel of three judges.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedRetsplejelovens § 12, stk. 3, nr. 1; Retsplejelovens § 226, stk. 1: A decision by a single judge or a panel of two judges is invalid if the law requires a panel of three judges.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Byrettens kendelse om, at sagen ikke skal henvises til landsretten, jf. retsplejelovens §226, stk. 1, og der ikke skal deltage 3 dommere i afgørelsen af sagen, jf. retsplejelovens §12, stk. 3, nr. 1, er ændret således, at der skal deltage 3 dommere i afgørelsen